kscrow


quality posts: 0 Private Messages kscrow

I love it! It makes me feel cool and it's freakin hot right now. :o)

tgentry


quality posts: 105 Private Messages tgentry

Staff

etripoli wrote:Only thing that strikes me as odd with this design, is that there are as many turtles as rabbits, and they spaced closer together than the rabbits are, visually implying that the two are the same. For it to represent 'faster out/slower in', visually, there should be more rabbits & closer together, with fewer turtles & farther apart.



Actually there's one more rabbit than there are turtles. If you look at the smaller version on the shirt you can see the extra rabbit, which is the large rabbit in the lower left as well. Interesting point about spaceing them apart though. I think visually it might not have worked as well, but conceptually makes sense.

tgentry


quality posts: 105 Private Messages tgentry

Staff

briannyc128 wrote:Awesome stuff dudes. Any chance you'd care to expand a bit about your collaboration process? You've both been quite prolific in producing well-executed shirts with great ideas in the past, so I'm curious as to who contributed what. I don't think I was able to look at either of the two Chogentry shirts this week and say "James was responsible for this part, and Travis for that."



Thanks Brian. It's funny because we can both see our individual styles in both of these. I think we'd probably just as soon keep it a mystery though.

heartluce


quality posts: 10 Private Messages heartluce
Re: green is for camouflage



Beautiful design and linework redghia. I love this one. Nice camouflage.

Foo228


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Foo228

[quote postid="2303231" user="eHalcyon"]@paulkremer
@Foo228 - Please don't resist. Just vote. /quote]

That's the thing though...I did vote for it already

You know what, if it places 1st, I'll definately get it.
3rd, it won't happen and 2nd I'll flip a coin 5 times for the answer.

So come on fate!

Foo228


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Foo228

[quote postid="2304225" user="Foo228"][quote postid="2303231" user="eHalcyon"]@paulkremer
@Foo228 - Please don't resist. Just vote. /



That's the thing though...I did vote for it already

You know what, if it places 1st, I'll definately get it.
3rd, it won't happen and 2nd I'll flip a coin 5 times for the answer.

So come on fate!



kenney9226


quality posts: 5 Private Messages kenney9226
Re: Pucker Hits the Roller Coaster One Too Many Times!



I'm surprised I didn't see any other "I rode the roller coaster one time too many" shirts.


...But I didn't look too hard.

Have a pleasant afternoon, people!

tamaleman33


quality posts: 0 Private Messages tamaleman33
Re: Chlorophyll



Unfortunately it looks too much like some kind of magic wand at a glance, I don't want to have to explain it. Great concept though!

tgentry


quality posts: 105 Private Messages tgentry

Staff

AdderXYU wrote:I still do. Did he steal your girlfriend? Oh Gentry, you playa.



I'm not a player, I just crush a lot.

Seriously though, I had a lot of fun working with James. He's a nice guy and very professional. If someone has a negative view of him for whatever reason I'd just recommend talking to him. I think you'd find he's a pretty decent person. In fact PM him. A lot. He really enjoys it when he gets 100-200 PMs a day, especially from strangers... ;)

mia3mom


quality posts: 0 Private Messages mia3mom
AdderXYU wrote:I still do. Did he steal your girlfriend? Oh Gentry, you playa.



wait, i thought he was married. I guess not, wish I had known sooner.

darn, all this wasted time.

& the Gaggle of Girls; so many shirts, so little space in the dresser!

camoor


quality posts: 1 Private Messages camoor
Re: The Green Man



Very nice, iconic, stylistic design.

dontwantaname


quality posts: 12 Private Messages dontwantaname

Volunteer Moderator

Re: Pucker Hits the Roller Coaster One Too Many Times!



That is why I don't go to amusement parks!

WE LURV YOU TOO! Dork!!!

Mijampet


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Mijampet
Re: Evolution



GMV, not sure why it's not getting more.

sigaru


quality posts: 0 Private Messages sigaru
Re: PLATYPUS POWERED CAR



oh me gosh, poor platterpoo.

ckpete2887


quality posts: 0 Private Messages ckpete2887

I love this.

ckpete2887


quality posts: 0 Private Messages ckpete2887

Way cool.

tgentry


quality posts: 105 Private Messages tgentry

Staff

mia3mom wrote:wait, i thought he was married. I guess not, wish I had known sooner.

darn, all this wasted time.



Happily married mia3mom

2thFairy


quality posts: 2 Private Messages 2thFairy

mia3mom


quality posts: 0 Private Messages mia3mom
tgentry wrote:Happily married mia3mom



teasing tgentry, teasing.

and married here too

& the Gaggle of Girls; so many shirts, so little space in the dresser!

sigaru


quality posts: 0 Private Messages sigaru
Re: The Guilt of Mr. Green



oh yes! i'd buy this. if it doesn't win [doesn't look like it will], you should get it printed somewhere else [maybe with the text suicide note] and if you do [which you SHOULD!!], pm me the link and i'd definitely buy one!!!!

daedalusknight


quality posts: 0 Private Messages daedalusknight
AdderXYU wrote:People need to stop presuming that just because someone enters they are an artist. Nope. I'm still just a hobby drawer, and so are most of these "artists" you say I should be easier on



There is one opinion, though, that the way one should treat another does not depend on whether that other is a hobbyist, an artist, or an untalented fool who repeatedly submits garbage and never seems to bother reading the rules. The opinion is that all these submitters are, in fact, people, and thus should be treated as much respect as any other person... and not with hatred or scorn. Clearly this is not an opinion shared by everyone.

Certainly it is true that this is a competition, and that those who do not obey the rules of the competition should be prepared to have their designs rejected. That, in itself, seems sufficient penalty for not following directions.

The desire that some have (in the past) voiced to attempt to raise the overall quality of the derby entries (in order to attract better designers, perhaps) is an admirable one. The method one uses to attempt to achieve this goal, though, must be chosen with care. One could argue that extremely polite commentary does not discourage low-quality designers from submitting. It seems, though, that (despite a general pervasive nastiness that sometimes surrounds these boards) anger does not seem to drive away these submissions either. What's more, there is a risk that many good designers see how poorly newcomers are treated and decide to take their art elsewhere.

There are, of course, various opinions on all these matters. One cannot claim to know positively what unseen effects all of one's actions have on those nearby. It is up to each of us to decide what the balance should be between politeness and scorn. It is certainly possible to be far, far too polite to people. It is also possible to be far too scornful as well. Perhaps, with practice, a good middle ground can be found.


Up for trade/sale in men's L:Shell Competition--The Shredder--Color Thee Fresh Here's my list of wants

shan24


quality posts: 3 Private Messages shan24
cheesesandwich wrote:I decided to resub this because it felt like a better entry than the original. Thanks for the feedback, all! Please give this angry little olive a vote. There is (most likely) no time for a victory, but I am happier with this layout (sans thought bubble) which is important also!


This is great, I was actually going to suggest this idea when I saw the other one. gmv!

endejester


quality posts: 0 Private Messages endejester
ckpete2887 wrote:I love this.



Thank you! <3

tjflashman77


quality posts: 0 Private Messages tjflashman77
Re: [url=http://shirt.woot.com/Derby/Entry.aspx?id=17520]Green Around,



I don't really mind that I submitted this late (as is normal for me). I don't expect it to do very well. I mean, it's got purple in it. C'mon! Purple?

Comments and critiques are appreciated, as always.

Greatest song ever written about JFK here. NSFW... or children... or anyone who's offended by the idea that JFK might have been a robot... fair warning.

tjflashman77


quality posts: 0 Private Messages tjflashman77
Re: [url=http://shirt.woot.com/Derby/Entry.aspx?id=17520]Green Around,



Greatest song ever written about JFK here. NSFW... or children... or anyone who's offended by the idea that JFK might have been a robot... fair warning.

mia3mom


quality posts: 0 Private Messages mia3mom
Re: [url=http://shirt.woot.com/Derby/Entry.aspx?id=17520]Green Around,



I'd suggest resubing with "and" instead of & in the title, so that your design will get quoted properly - now the image doesn't show up because of the & in the title.

btdt myself, both with the & and with the ride

& the Gaggle of Girls; so many shirts, so little space in the dresser!

toe2254


quality posts: 0 Private Messages toe2254
tjflashman77 wrote:



it looks awesome. purple and green always makes me think Mardi Gras though.

tjflashman77


quality posts: 0 Private Messages tjflashman77
mia3mom wrote:I'd suggest resubing with "and" instead of & in the title, so that your design will get quoted properly - now the image doesn't show up because of the & in the title.

btdt myself, both with the & and with the ride



Thanks Mia3... I'm gonna do that right now.

Greatest song ever written about JFK here. NSFW... or children... or anyone who's offended by the idea that JFK might have been a robot... fair warning.

endejester


quality posts: 0 Private Messages endejester
Re: Breaking Light



Beautifully done. And awesome use of the shirt color itself. Thank you thank you for breaking up the edges too, because that just adds -so- much to it.

memorysquares


quality posts: 0 Private Messages memorysquares
mia3mom wrote:this is beautiful, but not original artwork. it had previously been up for voting at threadless

I removed my vote



I think you misunderstand the term original artwork. It is still my original artwork. Just has been submitted elsewhere. It is not up for voting, so it is allowed

tjflashman77


quality posts: 0 Private Messages tjflashman77

What is it with kids and making themselves dizzy? Sorry about the purple... I couldn't help it.
Any comments, critiques, and of course, votes, are greatly appreciated.

Thanks Mia3mom for suggesting the resub... I wouldn't have even known about the ampersands because everything appeared fine on my machine.

Greatest song ever written about JFK here. NSFW... or children... or anyone who's offended by the idea that JFK might have been a robot... fair warning.

tjflashman77


quality posts: 0 Private Messages tjflashman77

Greatest song ever written about JFK here. NSFW... or children... or anyone who's offended by the idea that JFK might have been a robot... fair warning.

WarholBot


quality posts: 0 Private Messages WarholBot
memorysquares wrote:I think you misunderstand the term original artwork. It is still my original artwork. Just has been submitted elsewhere. It is not up for voting, so it is allowed



um dont you mean my artwork? hahaha

daedalusknight


quality posts: 0 Private Messages daedalusknight
memorysquares wrote:I think you misunderstand the term original artwork. It is still my original artwork. Just has been submitted elsewhere. It is not up for voting, so it is allowed



I think the concern here might be (if I can play Woot's advocate here) that the shirt has had previous exposure on another site, and thus gains a vote advantage for being familiar to the crowd. The concern is not whether the art is created by the designer but rather whether it has seen exposure in another forum. The idea being that art created specifically for this derby would be unfairly competing with art which has been seen before and already has its fans who wish it had been printed on Threadless.

I understand the designer's desire, here. It looks like a shirt that took an incredible amount of time and effort and I'd certainly want to give a design like that every chance I could give it in order to print. It might not be quite kosher, though, in terms of fair competition.

Lovely design, though.


Up for trade/sale in men's L:Shell Competition--The Shredder--Color Thee Fresh Here's my list of wants

mia3mom


quality posts: 0 Private Messages mia3mom
memorysquares wrote:I think you misunderstand the term original artwork. It is still my original artwork. Just has been submitted elsewhere. It is not up for voting, so it is allowed



no original artwork is supposed to mean artwork that is new to the derby. I am not going to vote for a design that was already given a chance elsewhere, the derby is supposed to be a place to showcase designs original to woot.

To quote the guidelines, and reasons for rejection:
"We determine that design is not exclusive to Woot - i.e., the designer (or a designate) has previously produced and distributed this design, or one substantially similar;"

perhaps woot is rethinking. I am not a rejector (though I'd be happy to volunteer), all I can do is point out when I see designs that are not following the rules. I think that this behavior is unfair to the other designers and unfair to the voters, so I will tattle and comment. Other people can decide if they wish to vote for a design or not.

And now we know that memorysquares is an alternate name for warholbot. very handy.

edited to add the line I was looking for originally:
quoting from "What is Woot":
"The difference is, these aren’t somebody else’s leftovers. Woot tees feature exclusive, original designs that you can’t get anywhere else (hence the terms “exclusive” and “original”)."

& the Gaggle of Girls; so many shirts, so little space in the dresser!

zayus1979


quality posts: 0 Private Messages zayus1979
ckpete2887 wrote:Way cool.



Thank you very much.

cheesesandwich


quality posts: 0 Private Messages cheesesandwich
shan24 wrote:This is great, I was actually going to suggest this idea when I saw the other one. gmv!



THANKS!

bsweber


quality posts: 1 Private Messages bsweber



edited to add the line I was looking for originally:
quoting from "What is Woot":
"The difference is, these aren’t somebody else’s leftovers. Woot tees feature exclusive, original designs that you can’t get anywhere else (hence the terms “exclusive” and “original”)."[/quote]


ummm.....i'm pretty sure if woot were to print this that is would indeed be an 'exclusive, original design that you can't get anywhere else'..... considering that it has never been produced anywhere else.

and if this design already has followers from another site, why on earth would woot NOT want to draw those fans to their own site?

these artists have to eat you know, give em a break.




heartluce


quality posts: 10 Private Messages heartluce
Re: Green (Olive) with Envy - RESUB



I like this version better cheese. GMV :D.

Xzanthis


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Xzanthis
FenStar wrote:The leaf seems to have something protruding from between its legs.
Also, didn't we decide fireballs with faces on them where copyright? :P



It's leafy's twig! I don't think you can copyright fireball's with faces, they've just been in too many old cartoons. It's almost like copyrighting a smiley I think. Either way though, these little guys aren't picking up very much momentum