Anthony3419


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Anthony3419
Re: monkey



I knew someone would do this one...Clever...


camaya


quality posts: 0 Private Messages camaya
Re: Pet Dodo



why is everyone so into dodos, i personally think they should bring back the Yankees CHE design.

godfreytemple


quality posts: 0 Private Messages godfreytemple
AdderXYU wrote:Dear woot,

While I am in agreement with the basic flavor of this message (ie: write some damn rules and stick by them), I am ecstatic that you rejected this shirt, despite it being nowhere near the fog at the time. There's nothing wearable about it. I understand that that may not have been your intended goal in its rejection, but your lack of reason gives me hope that a simple copypasted tank running over a stick figure might be too low quality even for a site that has printed more unofficial, unparodic merch and kawaii/stick figure idiocy than any other shirt site would try without feeling ashamed. Please continue with more of these "quality control" rejections, because anyone trying to find a political motivation behind this rejection are really just striving to pick at a scab that should be allowed to flake off naturally.



Adder, while I understand your views and share them in the case of clear rules well adhered to, AB's comments were attached to my rejected "No Joy for Yahweh" design. And while I'm of mixed views about the rejection (depending on the actual reason) I want to echo her call for better transparency in the rejection reasons.

In my case had it been "Not your art", I might have made an argument but would have understood. If it had been "Tracing is for wimps", again I would have understood and been okay even though in my ignorance I felt I had good reasons for going that way at the time (even if I never will again).

Equally, if the design was deemed by Woot to be offensive ("offensive content" "controversial issue"), it would be nice to be told because it would show where Woot's level of tolerance was. The same could be said for any rejected work. If it violates a rule - say so. If it doesn't please explain.

77 is over. I'm not arguing for changes. But as a designer participating in the derbies I'd like to know what precise reasons lead to my work being rejected. If for no other purpose then to help me decide what sort of designs to submit in future.

Thanks for reading such a large lump of text.

bpr2


quality posts: 158 Private Messages bpr2

congrats on 2nd

that was fun while it lasted!

okybibuy


quality posts: 0 Private Messages okybibuy
Re: Apraham Lincoln



This was off topic?

Deinonychus


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Deinonychus
Re: Dinosaurs Who Are Communist for Some Reason



Apparently we won't be able to buy this.

JustJiggles


quality posts: 0 Private Messages JustJiggles
JustJiggles wrote:Nice to know we are in agreement. Any guesses on final sales? I'll say 1,300.



Ouch. I was WAY over.

Bowmanbmb


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Bowmanbmb
Re: Original Sin Avoided



They really need to give this one an editor's choice bypass. I love this shirt

SkekTek


quality posts: 17 Private Messages SkekTek
Stexe wrote:Eh, this was a good design, but it should have been larger.

I don't care about wearing a dancing girl on my shirt, I like people to be able to SEE what I'm wearing...

Anyway, good job and maybe next time you'll win!



There was a larger version submitted as a v2 which ended up around 21st place...

Since it didn't get selected as an HM, I'll be offering both designs on my own on a variety of shirt colors...

megedwar


quality posts: 0 Private Messages megedwar
Re: LPod- Analog won the format war



Great Design... I want it!

smklung23


quality posts: 0 Private Messages smklung23
Re: Dinosaurs Who Are Communist for Some Reason



this would have been the one time i wood have accepted wearing a dino shirt. wow real funny design it's too bad wasnt popular enough

generalwoodchuck


quality posts: 0 Private Messages generalwoodchuck
Re: Cowboy Robots.



I'd buy that.

ph0enix1211


quality posts: 0 Private Messages ph0enix1211
Re: Cowboy Robots.



If it wins, I'm 1st in line to buy.

e440


quality posts: 0 Private Messages e440
Re: Dinosaurs Who Are Communist for Some Reason



So, which date would it be possible to buy this one?

AdderXYU


quality posts: 38 Private Messages AdderXYU
godfreytemple wrote:Adder, while I understand your views and share them in the case of clear rules well adhered to, AB's comments were attached to my rejected "No Joy for Yahweh" design. And while I'm of mixed views about the rejection (depending on the actual reason) I want to echo her call for better transparency in the rejection reasons.



Mea culpa. I read the part about IABE's entry and presumed that was that... wasn't checking individual entries at the time.

I completely agree on transparent rejection reasons. But in an ideal world, woot would reject for sucking, too, as far as I'm concerned, which would make transparency hard. So long as they have no deeper quality control than their "rules" though, I concur that they need to be crystal clear and consistent.

quonya


quality posts: 0 Private Messages quonya

I loved this shirt and wanted to get one. Great design beautiful colors!

Re: Maybe she said it for a reason