peppersagooddog wrote:fables was better.
alot better.
NO, ITS NOT EXACT, BUT CONCEPT WAS HERS FIRST
It's kind of funny that, for the longest time I thought you were clever though a bit mean. I realize now, though, that you don't really even have that bit of clever going for you.
The creature Cerberus is an ancient, ancient myth. It is generally portrayed as quite monstrous, quite often with a serpent's tail. Fable pretty accurately drew that, with a slight twist of it also being a beast that likes to catch a tennis bаll.
Now I have had golden retrievers since I was a little boy, way, way back in the 1960s. Every one I have owned or known has had a love affair with the tennis bаll.
Our original concept was that that Jupiter, or Zeus, or whichever god it was that created Cerberus just couldn't get it right, and every one he made was a really cute, happy, playful dog (and 1 cat) who couldn't guard its own bowl of food. The design had Jupiter with his head in his hands surrounded by all those failures.
The design was too busy, and we tightened it up to one single cute retriever-type dog which had a tennis bаll in its mouth. It is not at all a scary-looking beast, unlike Fable's design, but really quite a cute dog, ready to play.
Your suggestion that Fable somehow owns the concept of three headed dogs with tennis bаlls is laughable. Get a life, and stop harassing my daughter. This comment is just ugly, and you ought to be embarrassed:
peppersagooddog wrote:fables was better.
alot better.
They are very different in style, concept, intent, and mood. I vastly prefer the sketchy look of Laura's drawing to Fable's design. Your opinion is unsupported by anything other than that you don't like it.
I know you got what you were going for because of how disgusted and pissed off you've made me. Congratulations, ugliness rules yet again in the woot derby comments. well done, now go find someone else's design to soil with your attention.
