quality posts: 0
HeartlineTwist wrote:Why? I mean, it's really easy to just say "This isn't steampunk" or "Lul, steam pipes don't equal steampunk," but these comments completely ignore the detail in the contraption part of the design and the execution of that feature in general.
However steampunk isn't about a contraption in the middle, it's a whole style and ethos, simply having a contraption as part of the design doesn't make this steampunk, there's a few tiny changes that could have been made to have make this fit but I would state from several people that love the steampunk genere, this design doesn't quite fit.
Signatures? I don't believe in them...
quality posts: 1
mistmi01 wrote:I'm pretty sure the 17th century wasn't the Victorian era. I could be wrong. But I don't think so.
Related tales date back as far as the 14th century. Well outside whatever new definition we're coming up with for Victorian.
17th century would actually fit "Baroque".
member of the sam jackson alliance
maybe even the president ^m i rite
quality posts: 3
Re: Steamworks Operatica V.2
I think there's a little to much ink on this shirt. I fear that the minute I get sweaty it would get all gross.
13 - Woots
1 - Accessories.woot
1 - Tech.woot
2 - Home.woots
3 - Sport.woots
26 - Shirt.woots
3 - Sellout.woots