lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond
Re: All Glory to the Hypno-Bag



the looks I'd be getting from my postal person... hehe

lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond
Re: [url=http://shirt.woot.com/Derby/Entry.aspx?id=34434]My Woot Entry



kicky

lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond

lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond

lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond
Re: Woot Oasis



good use of the colors...

lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond
Re: A Monsterous Deal!



I thought about doing one like this...I like the way the face jumps off the bag

tgentry


quality posts: 105 Private Messages tgentry

Staff

saturniid7462 wrote:My point is that the rules did not say "destroyed" but "altered". IMHO, the rotation of the logo constitutes altering it. I sincerely doubt most companies would place their primary graphic symbol at a 45 degree angle on their bags.

My guess is that if/when this wins, (as someone said earlier) woot will have the logo rotated back to it's proper angle, especially if it's the most prominent appearance.

Sorry to disagree with you, but labeling modified logos as "destroyed" seems a bit harsh, seeing as some of the modifications were pretty clever.



If I have an object and I rotate it 45 degrees it is still the same object. Say it's a coffee mug. If the handle faces north or west, it's still the same coffee mug. If I break off the handle or paint over it, it's not the same coffee mug. Rotating or translating (aka moving) an object (in this case a logo) is not altering the object itself. Clever or not, the modifications that were rejected are actual modifications that change the icon given. I can open up a thesaurus and come up with twelve other words than destroyed, but it's essentially that. You are no longer dealing with the same entity.

As for what most companies would do, that's complete speculation. I have a Diet Coke can on my desk right now that has the logo running sideways. I'm pretty sure at one point they ran at 45 degrees. Yet the logo remains intact. If woot wants to straighten it after the fact that's their business (I don't think a slight tilt makes it any harder to distinguish the brand. You yourself said you didn't even notice until recently). Tilting it didn't change the icon provided, so it falls under the rules given for this derby. If it didn't it would have been rejected. You said before that entries had been rejected for this but mine had not. In truth none had that I could see (if you see one point it out, I looked them over twice but could have missed one). There's no double standard or unfairness as some would prefer to believe.

You're free to disagree with my view on this, you certainly don't have to apologize for it. I'm simply offering a rebuttal to what I see as unfounded complaints I've received on this entry.

eHalcyon


quality posts: 66 Private Messages eHalcyon
Xanzibar wrote:I always submit my templates at 600x600, and it appears to work out fine.



When Woot changed their layout (a few months ago now) the size for shirt comps went down to 580x580. It may not have been so noticeable, but you might want to use the correct size to avoid possible reductions in quality in the future.

(Unofficial) Derby Rules (outdated?)
Designing for the Derby (definitely outdated)
Tips for New Designers (always useful)

earthart


quality posts: 0 Private Messages earthart

Thank you very much everyone for the votes so far. I have never been in the fog before and of course hope I am fortunate enough to remain there throughout the rest of the derby. Having never been here before, I really don't know what to expect in the morning.

I'm usually at work when the derby ends, so I don't get to witness the final countdown. And I've never before had a dog in the fight toward the end, so I'm nervous and excited all at once. Needless to say, I am very happy with how this derby has gone, and regardless of how it ultimately ends, I am thrilled with the results.

That being said though, I would obviously shoot to the moon if I were to actually make it to the podium, and since I never actually posted the final design to the forum, I figured I would do it here this once and ask you for your support if you like it. I do feel like maybe I'm the underdog of the fog, but with the final stretch around the corner, I would love to become the dark horse instead! Thanks for your consideration, and thanks again to those of you who have already voted. You made my week!



spongecake


quality posts: 5 Private Messages spongecake
Re: Let's go to the Beach!



So sorry that this joyous design did not make it into the fog.

Lucky, would you want to shop it around to a towel company at some point?

Hey woot, how about getting this manufactured as a beach towel for us to enjoy?



jmmbell1987


quality posts: 78 Private Messages jmmbell1987

All the little details in this design are delightful. My favorite is the little guy giving a fist pump after getting his new shirt.

I hope this prints.

lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond
Re: Woot across the world



simple but nice

lonelypond


quality posts: 240 Private Messages lonelypond

rachel1aaron


quality posts: 0 Private Messages rachel1aaron
earthart wrote:Thank you very much everyone for the votes so far. I have never been in the fog before and of course hope I am fortunate enough to remain there throughout the rest of the derby. Having never been here before, I really don't know what to expect in the morning.

I'm usually at work when the derby ends, so I don't get to witness the final countdown. And I've never before had a dog in the fight toward the end, so I'm nervous and excited all at once. Needless to say, I am very happy with how this derby has gone, and regardless of how it ultimately ends, I am thrilled with the results.

That being said though, I would obviously shoot to the moon if I were to actually make it to the podium, and since I never actually posted the final design to the forum, I figured I would do it here this once and ask you for your support if you like it. I do feel like maybe I'm the underdog of the fog, but with the final stretch around the corner, I would love to become the dark horse instead! Thanks for your consideration, and thanks again to those of you who have already voted. You made my week!



It's been fun seeing the great response you've had from the voters this week! I really am hoping to see you waving from the moon! Once again - Great Job, and good luck!

lucky1988


quality posts: 20 Private Messages lucky1988
Re: Let's go to the Beach!



@input
@Xanzibar
@bradyson-hope you didn't get sunburned too badly
@ansharp
@lonelypond
@spongecake- a towel would really be something.

Thanks for all the support everyone!

themaverick


quality posts: 0 Private Messages themaverick
tgentry wrote:If I have an object and I rotate it 45 degrees it is still the same object. Say it's a coffee mug. If the handle faces north or west, it's still the same coffee mug. If I break off the handle or paint over it, it's not the same coffee mug. Rotating or translating (aka moving) an object (in this case a logo) is not altering the object itself. Clever or not, the modifications that were rejected are actual modifications that change the icon given. I can open up a thesaurus and come up with twelve other words than destroyed, but it's essentially that. You are no longer dealing with the same entity.

As for what most companies would do, that's complete speculation. I have a Diet Coke can on my desk right now that has the logo running sideways. I'm pretty sure at one point they ran at 45 degrees. Yet the logo remains intact. If woot wants to straighten it after the fact that's their business (I don't think a slight tilt makes it any harder to distinguish the brand. You yourself said you didn't even notice until recently). Tilting it didn't change the icon provided, so it falls under the rules given for this derby. If it didn't it would have been rejected. You said before that entries had been rejected for this but mine had not. In truth none had that I could see (if you see one point it out, I looked them over twice but could have missed one). There's no double standard or unfairness as some would prefer to believe.

You're free to disagree with my view on this, you certainly don't have to apologize for it. I'm simply offering a rebuttal to what I see as unfounded complaints I've received on this entry.



Look what we have here! DIdn't expect to wake up and sees feathers flew over me just saying the logo was crooked. I'm glad you guys kept the arguments respectful though and you both make strong cases for your perspectives. I was gonna stay on the sidelines, but this discussion is a good one and I think I can add something to it.

I studied this a good bit and can see both sides and no matter what the argument thefact is they allowed the design to stand and I'm pretty sure it's gonna be the winner and I'm happy for it. BUT I'm also pretty sure that woot will straihgten the crook outta the logo when they print it.

Here's why. We've seen the rules. Logo "exactly as presented in the included templates" The logo in the template is oriented a specific way. Now I give you the fact that the logo used is intact in that it isn't destroyed, obscured. But I have to say it IS altered.

The woot logo is an icon and icons are diffrent from text logos. Changing their orientation can effect the message so most of the time icon logos are set in one specific way.

You said in your first response "positioning, rotating,and scaling are not destroying the logo in any way" and the first sentence in your follow up is "If I have an object and I rotate it 45 degrees it is still the same object."

But look at my first 3 pix below and you see that isn't right. The guy in the wheelchair is fallin over, the Red Cross becomes the red multiplication sign, adn the poor Michelin man went from having a swell day to happily falling off a cliff!







And since you say rotating can be part of the mix, you chose 45 degrees. Would 90 degrees be alright? How about 180 degrees? Or any degree you choose? See below and let me know what you think.





They ain't lookin too good. Hey, whoa, wait a minute. Those would make some neat shirts actually! I call dibs if they haven't already been done! Unlikely. The expression on the falcon's face is priceless.

Back to the issue. What angles are ok? Would any angle be ok with the woot logo?



See? Changing something's angle, especially na icon, does change what it is. In you guys' first back/forth saturnid pointed out that there were rejections for designs having a combo of altered and unaltered woot logos, and you answered they were all rejected cuz the logo was blocked or deformed some way. In your follow up you asked for an example.

I remember one off the top of my head because I was bummed when it got tossed. It's right near bottom at least on my screen when you sort by vote called Universe Of Woot. I really like that one and had a hard time figuring out what was wrong withit.

I read the thread to sort it out and seems the only issue with it is that the unaltered logo at the bottom right was too small. but reading the rules again they said specifically scaling was ok. They didn't say what size or anything so that artist imo did follow the rules exactly and was still rejected.

That's beside the point tho. woot makes strange rejections for strange reasons often. With yours the issue is you didn't include an unaltered logo because I'm thinking and it seems saturn is thinking and I'm guessing some other people might think that rotating a logo is alteration. I think my examples made a good argument for that and I'm betting they will straighten the woot logo when they print it. I could be wrong but I guess we'll see who is right.

Sorry to take the other side on this one this time. I'll be out fishing today but will check back later to see if you replied when I get home. Could be at dusk if they're biting! Wish me luck and good luck to you and congrats if you do take it.

picasserole


quality posts: 0 Private Messages picasserole
re: your woot has been served!


Gotta agree with stargirl! Very Stylish and skilful..;]

tibetbro


quality posts: 0 Private Messages tibetbro
Re: Land of the Rising Woot



It's almost as good as a Karate Kid bandana.

dsdm


quality posts: 0 Private Messages dsdm
re: phonebooth sold seperately (resub)



Holy--! I checked this morning at 6 and I had 157 votes in 23rd place. Checked an hour or so later and I had 175 in 20th. Drove 15 minutes to work and now I have 189! Fantastic! Vote, people, VOTE! :-D

smcain


quality posts: 0 Private Messages smcain
dsdm wrote:Yeah, I liked it better too. And I didn't think until after I resubmitted, but can you have the exclamation mark in a yellow circle? Because then I might have left it as it was without the disqualifying marks. But I just used the blue one in the template to be on the safe side. It does have its advantages though, I think the thumbnail image stands out more. And it seems to be rising in the ranks pretty steadily regardless



The blue shirt with the yellow logo was much better. You've seen everyone using the sun as their woot logo - why change?

tgentry


quality posts: 105 Private Messages tgentry

Staff

themaverick wrote:Look what we have here! DIdn't expect to wake up and sees feathers flew over me just saying the logo was crooked. I'm glad you guys kept the arguments respectful though and you both make strong cases for your perspectives. I was gonna stay on the sidelines, but this discussion is a good one and I think I can add something to it.



You make a lot of good points, but you forget that in all of the examples you provided, the icon DOES remain intact even though the positioning has changed. You STILL haven't altered the icon itself. The meaning may change in the examples you provide, just as Coke slanting it's logo at a 45 degree angle might make it look more "edgy". They could put the Gatorade logo at 45 degrees on a pair of boxer shorts. Does that change it's meaning? Would people suddenly not recognize what it is? We're talking product and packaging design here. Whatever happens to the logo, it remains intact as the logo, it's presented in a respectful way, and people still recognize it as such. I turned the logo less than 45 degrees and it still came across to everyone as the woot logo.

As I said before, if woot wants to change it then that's their call, just like it's their call if they wanted to change any entry submitted. We'll see who's right or wrong on that? I'm not even arguing the point. The fact remains that they haven't rejected a single other person for simply moving or rotating the icon, so it seems they think it fits within the rules of this derby.

I'll close out by saying I'm very proud of this entry and I really appreciate the votes it got. Hopefully the rules are so clear in the future that there will be no room for interpretation or confusion.

dsdm


quality posts: 0 Private Messages dsdm
smcain wrote:The blue shirt with the yellow logo was much better. You've seen everyone using the sun as their woot logo - why change?



Ambiguity over the whole Woot logo thing. In the edited rules, it said the logo was the exclamation point in the circle, and the logo was included in the template. The logo in the template was blue. It also said when they said exclamation point, they meant "logo" and that it had to be on a blue, black, or yellow background. I wasn't sure at the time if that meant the circle could be those colors, or if it meant the blue circle had to be on a background of those colors. This being my first time entering, I also wasn't sure if multiple versions of the same design were allowed, or if that practice was frowned upon. So I decided to go with what I knew for sure would be allowed. It was also late at night when the design was rejected, so I just wanted to make some quick changes, resubmit, and go to bed.

As to seeing other people use a yellow Woot Logo, I couldn't be sure if that was really allowed or if they just hadn't been banned yet. My original design was submitted immediately when submissions opened on Friday, made it through the first round of rejections based on the Woot Logo, and didn't get rejected until Sunday night. Just last night I saw a design that had been up pretty much from the start get rejected.

I liked the original design too, as the shiny parts made it look more "hero," and the blue shirt was more like Superman. But the new design has started to grow on me too. I think the yellow shirt stands out more in the thumbnail version.

All told, I'm doing pretty well for my first derby. Initial design got within a hair of 7th, and my current design went from 96th to 18th, and is still climbing. I'm eager to see how high it gets before voting ends.

Feeferscat


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Feeferscat
Re: Derby Winners = Bags of Win



The turtle (right hand side 3rd down) has an A on it's shell.

What's up with that?

Signatures? I don't believe in them...

KIDA26


quality posts: 2 Private Messages KIDA26
CrescentDebris wrote:Thanks everyone! It always seems that when I have a week to work on an entry I still only find 1 day to work on it. I had no expectations of being at the top but this idea popped in my head and I thought it would at least be a rather unique entry. It was fun to work on. Especially since I didn't have to decide on colors. Oh the pains of deciding on colors sometimes.



I would totally buy this if you could print it as a shirt. I absolutely LOVE it. Even if you changed it to have no Woot reference on it at all, I would be estatic to have this as a T. It's a very underrated design IMO.

studio1172


quality posts: 0 Private Messages studio1172
Re: REVOLUTION IS NOW!



Alrighty! We are down to the wire with the derby, let's get some votes in! Fists in the air!

I appreciate all the support and votes that you guys have given this design! I didn't expect that it would get this high up! Thank you

Xanzibar


quality posts: 2 Private Messages Xanzibar
Purplehayesdennison wrote:Yeah it's a peace sign. It may not make sense, it was more of an aesthetic addition. Thanks for the comments.



So thats what it is!! I still think an alligator would be better.

What is this?
http://www.rewards1.com/index.php?referrer_id=1590902

Xanzibar


quality posts: 2 Private Messages Xanzibar
lonelypond wrote:the looks I'd be getting from my postal person... hehe



You wouldn't be getting any. He'd be zombified and constantly falling over, drooling and mumbling about completely nonsensical things, whilst talking to a cat he thinks is a dog.
Thats the power of the hypno bag.

What is this?
http://www.rewards1.com/index.php?referrer_id=1590902

Xanzibar


quality posts: 2 Private Messages Xanzibar
Re: Planet Woot !



Thanks for all the awesome comments guys!!
I thought i was gonna do really well this derby, but i guess this just wasn't my derby. And the fact that there were many more awesome designs coulda had something to do with it.
47th ain't bad. Just gotta get higher next time!

What is this?
http://www.rewards1.com/index.php?referrer_id=1590902

paulhep


quality posts: 0 Private Messages paulhep

This is hilarious!

GO VOTE!! This shirt is the Awesomeest!!! supermegavirus

lkackman


quality posts: 2 Private Messages lkackman
Melkoret wrote:This design should win, more than the cloud fogged ones...



Hrmm... Not so. This is a well executed illustration, but if you are not a cat person, than you would not want this on your bag every shirt you get. The designs in the fog are less specific in topic and are probably more appealing to a greater audience.

I am not a cat person and would not want this to win, however I did vote for it due to its overall clean and well done design. A well executed design always deserves a vote in my opinion.

eHalcyon


quality posts: 66 Private Messages eHalcyon
Feeferscat wrote:The turtle (right hand side 3rd down) has an A on it's shell.

What's up with that?



Pretty sure it's just a scribble. It's based on Vandalized Turtle.

(Unofficial) Derby Rules (outdated?)
Designing for the Derby (definitely outdated)
Tips for New Designers (always useful)

eHalcyon


quality posts: 66 Private Messages eHalcyon
themaverick wrote:I read the thread to sort it out and seems the only issue with it is that the unaltered logo at the bottom right was too small. but reading the rules again they said specifically scaling was ok. They didn't say what size or anything so that artist imo did follow the rules exactly and was still rejected.



If you're talking about the entry I think you are, it should be noted that the rejection reason was "modified logo". Presumably the rejectionator saw the MAIN logo in the center of the design, modified, and hit his big red "REJECT" button. I agree that the design did in fact follow all the rules, but the problem was that the actual logo wasn't noticeable - an important trait in branding. If the logo isn't noticeable at a glance, it doesn't well reflect the shirt.woot brand - and that WAS one of the catch-all rules Woot had in place for this derby.

I have to side with tgentry and his interpretation of alteration/modification/destruction of a logo, but you make some great points. My gut instinct is that Woot will leave the logo angled if tgentry's design wins, but I also wouldn't be surprised if they did "correct" the orientation.

(Unofficial) Derby Rules (outdated?)
Designing for the Derby (definitely outdated)
Tips for New Designers (always useful)

zippolight2002


quality posts: 0 Private Messages zippolight2002
Re: there is something awesome in here



Lol cute and so true :D

earthart


quality posts: 0 Private Messages earthart

I just posted this in the Contenders blog but figured it couldn't hurt to put it here because you can never say thank you enough. Thanks to everyone who voted and kept me in the fog. It is deeply appreciated. I unfortunately, well fortunately, am out the door for our family camping trip and will not get the actual results until I come back Sunday. Thanks again especially to rachel1aaron (last time I promise) who was a huge help in bringing the design to life. Before I have a Sally Field moment, I'm going to sign off. Thanks again everyone! Wish me luck! Okay, maybe you can say thank you too much. My excuse is unabated excitement.

matto1985


quality posts: 0 Private Messages matto1985
KIDA26 wrote:It's not a huge deal, and I am not really upset or anything... I am just a little disappointed.



I have to agree with KIDA26. I like the concept, but the quality isn't all that incredible. The layout really throws the whole thing off for me. Too much empty space in the middle. It also kind of reminds me of the Wu Tang symbol.

mopsie2002


quality posts: 4 Private Messages mopsie2002
Re: Derby Winners = Bags of Win



I dislike that this is in the fog. I appreciate the motivation behind it, getting all those winners in there, but I just don't think it looks good. :-\

Oregonian through and through <3...even if I call North Carolina my home now.

Bporterfield


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Bporterfield

How did this not win? Auggghhhh! Twas brilliant.

BcP

genericsmith


quality posts: 15 Private Messages genericsmith
Re: Cogs



I'd just like to thank the few people that voted for me... YAY!

Munchy Attack If you can find the name of this artist & real song title I'll buy you a daily woot shirt (your choice what day)

Dystopia Dark Lager, Where the Wild Parties at?, B.A. Bearacus, and many more wanted in XXL(PLEASE!!!)
Edgar Allen Poe shall remained headlock'd until Nevermore is reckoned.

mcowles


quality posts: 2 Private Messages mcowles
Re: there is something awesome in here



It would be neat if the bag the cat was looking in also had this image on the side of it... one of those infinite sequence things. I did vote for this, sorry it didn't win .

DaSwish


quality posts: 0 Private Messages DaSwish

Speaking of small details...I like how the electrical sockets are smiley faces.. lol