Shigwarm


quality posts: 8 Private Messages Shigwarm
The Tim wrote:I find it interesting that the E.T. Fail shirt was rejected for "Similar shirts exist," but this one is still in the running.

The Woot works in mysterious ways.



Maybe no one has officially "tattled on this". Maybe Woot doesn't even read through the posts. Who knows.

spanishmel


quality posts: 0 Private Messages spanishmel
Leahbh wrote:This is a TERRIBLE rejection. Why is that stupid jetpack shirt still not rejected. It's way more similar to already printed shirts than this one is.
And that example that someone else posted as similar is NOT. In that one, ET stole the bike and pushed elliot off, in this one, they both crash into the moon, not similar at all. And as for your similar colors argument, it's a freakin' moon and sky, what other colors were they supposed to use?
You all just don't like this shirt and wanted it rejected. Well, you got your wish, now go tattle on the jetpack shirt.



Leahbh - I "FAIL" to see why you are such an avid defender of Radiomode.

If two t-shirt designs look similar at a passing glance...then they are way too similar. Changing the position/activity of the characters is not enough to create a significant distinction.

The original design is for sale on a well known T-SHIRT site. Do you really think people on a website for t-shirt design aren't going to be aware of current designs in THE SAME MARKET? Budi Kwan participates in a TON of t-shirts competitions and sells to multiple sites. Its incredibly hard to beleive that Budi accidentally created something that looks just like a featured design on another site. A more likely scenario is that he saw the design and figured he could change it just enough to pass for different...I guarantee you the original designer would be pissed.

As for other colors an artist might make the moon? My answer is, any color.

P.S. Don't bother responding with your typical defense, "Its just a t-shirt." We've been over that.

ermiewormie


quality posts: 0 Private Messages ermiewormie
Re: Fairy Splat!



I love it. GOOOD LUCK!

wootasourous


quality posts: 119 Private Messages wootasourous
Lagbert wrote:Huh? Why would dandelions be grounds for rejection?



Just google, "Dandelion shirts" and you can see why. Also, there have been shirts submitted in a derby by Jasneko that were rejected for this same concept, so unfortunately, the hammer should fall on you as well.

mjl9320


quality posts: 0 Private Messages mjl9320
Re: Fail



had a feeling this would be rejected. was hard to believe this had not been done before.

EclecticMuse


quality posts: 0 Private Messages EclecticMuse
Oldyeller89 wrote:These entries make me angry on so many levels.



Er ... care to explain?

srm8ib4


quality posts: 4 Private Messages srm8ib4
Re: Sky Fishing



This is the only good design in the fog right now.

pankay


quality posts: 0 Private Messages pankay

i love it!!!! it's beautiful
the white definitely looks better.

Leahbh


quality posts: 3 Private Messages Leahbh
spanishmel wrote:Leahbh - I "FAIL" to see why you are such an avid defender of Radiomode.

If two t-shirt designs look similar at a passing glance...then they are way too similar. Changing the position/activity of the characters is not enough to create a significant distinction.

The original design is for sale on a well known T-SHIRT site. Do you really think people on a website for t-shirt design aren't going to be aware of current designs in THE SAME MARKET? Budi Kwan participates in a TON of t-shirts competitions and sells to multiple sites. Its incredibly hard to beleive that Budi accidentally created something that looks just like a featured design on another site. A more likely scenario is that he saw the design and figured he could change it just enough to pass for different...I guarantee you the original designer would be pissed.

As for other colors an artist might make the moon? My answer is, any color.

P.S. Don't bother responding with your typical defense, "Its just a t-shirt." We've been over that.



i'm not defending the artist, I'm defending the design. I mostly don't even look at the artists, I vote for shirts I'd buy. But woot needs to use the same rules for everyone. If they reject this, they need to reject the jetpack shirt which has been done on threadless and countless other sites. it's ridiculous. It's stupid and woot s u c k s! I'm getting very close to being done with this site and their "rules". I'm not giving them anymore of my money.

banzaaiii


quality posts: 0 Private Messages banzaaiii
Re: Your Time to Fly



well it seems like this shirt wont get rejected. there are some similar designs out there, but right now im thinking this would be kind of cool to wear, so GMV

banzaaiii


quality posts: 0 Private Messages banzaaiii
Shigwarm wrote:Maybe no one has officially "tattled on this". Maybe Woot doesn't even read through the posts. Who knows.



and im 100% sure woot has looked at this design, it being in the fog and all. if they havent had time or something they will for sure

mikan36


quality posts: 0 Private Messages mikan36
Re: Flying Fish V.3 (Watercolor on white)



oooh! This is great Jasneko -- I feel like the style is a little different from your usual designs, but I love it. It has that watercolor effect that is really appropriate for your theme/design. :D GMV!

DirkDDarring


quality posts: 0 Private Messages DirkDDarring
Re: Sky Fishing



Nice design all the way around, good luck.


Michael Irwin
Graphic artist
www.wix.com/idforu/idforu

alliecatn1


quality posts: 0 Private Messages alliecatn1
Re: Yea, like we'd fall for that again...



Lol, not a fan of the black line around the image on the shirt though.

ranusbc


quality posts: 0 Private Messages ranusbc
Cryzabey wrote:Sorry, but a cool back shirt is comparable to a cool fanny pack.



haha yeah i have to agree with that. also, similar shirts exist, so i think this should be rejected so more creative designs can fog

Oldyeller89


quality posts: 18 Private Messages Oldyeller89
EclecticMuse wrote:Er ... care to explain?



vectors/pictures, copyright, text, disregard for the rules etc...

Bunnies Ogling Carrots#39;s:
4/1/10: 2.5 lbs---2/25/10: 5.6 lbs
12/25/09: 22.4 lbs---10/28/09: 5.4 lbs
9/25/09: 8.2 lbs---4/1/09: 3.2 lbs
9/22/10: 18.4 lbs---12/1/10: 2.1 lbs

alliecatn1


quality posts: 0 Private Messages alliecatn1
Re: Turkey Take Off!



Lol, reminds me of the Adams Family movie during their play at summer camp :-)

alliecatn1


quality posts: 0 Private Messages alliecatn1
Re: Grandma's Gonna Be Mad



Love the colors!!

whalen25


quality posts: 1 Private Messages whalen25
srm8ib4 wrote:This is the only good design in the fog right now.



Quoted for truth.

All praise be to science.

ChefRAZ


quality posts: 20 Private Messages ChefRAZ
Leahbh wrote:i'm not defending the artist, I'm defending the design. I mostly don't even look at the artists, I vote for shirts I'd buy. But woot needs to use the same rules for everyone. If they reject this, they need to reject the jetpack shirt which has been done on threadless and countless other sites. it's ridiculous. It's stupid and woot s u c k s! I'm getting very close to being done with this site and their "rules". I'm not giving them anymore of my money.



anything in the fog that gets rejected , woot has a meetng about it,so wait till tomorrow cause that serve beer in their meetings, and they last all day. so only one per day. wait.

whalen25


quality posts: 1 Private Messages whalen25
alliecatn1 wrote:Love the colors!!



Unfortunately this may not print here, if it gets printed elsewhere be sure to let us all know!

All praise be to science.

whalen25


quality posts: 1 Private Messages whalen25
Re: Flying



If this doesn't print on woot please let us all know where we can buy this elsewhere!

All praise be to science.

sugareeali


quality posts: 9 Private Messages sugareeali
Re: Something I Must Do



The funny thing is--when I first looked at this shirt I thought that the skyfish was coming to save/take away the waterfish. It wasn't until I started reading the comments that I reviewed it and saw the sorrow element. Anyway...still love it. Maybe I'm dumb.

jabberjaws13


quality posts: 2 Private Messages jabberjaws13
mjl9320 wrote:if the cat was in a superman pose, then yes.




so by that logic this isn't on theme because the fish aren't in a superman pose, nor is the fisherman, nor is the floating island.

as ramy stated it is on theme because of the vague rules of this particular derby. regardless, i still like the design, but you are still an id10t.

Happy Beer.

EldanRetha


quality posts: 0 Private Messages EldanRetha
atomiccate wrote:i really like the concept and squirrel/flying machine, but i don't care for the tree. it looks like an afterthought and doesn't add to the composition, IMO... but the idea is really cute.



I like the tree, definitely intended for it to be there, but looking at it more I'm considering resubing with some falling leaves and a nest in the top, but I doubt I'll have time :/

HalfWheat


quality posts: 18 Private Messages HalfWheat
ChefRAZ wrote:anything in the fog that gets rejected , woot has a meetng about it,so wait till tomorrow cause that serve beer in their meetings, and they last all day. so only one per day. wait.



Beer! That explains everything. I think I'll go have a beer now. It also fixes everything.

Zyphron


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Zyphron
Leahbh wrote:i'm not defending the artist, I'm defending the design. I mostly don't even look at the artists, I vote for shirts I'd buy. But woot needs to use the same rules for everyone. If they reject this, they need to reject the jetpack shirt which has been done on threadless and countless other sites. it's ridiculous. It's stupid and woot s u c k s! I'm getting very close to being done with this site and their "rules". I'm not giving them anymore of my money.



you may be pissed but fact is, this shirt was similar in alot of ways to the other.
Sure the concept was different, but it Had rejection all over it from the start.

which leaps into the vacuum because I loved it.

as for the Jetpack. give it time. it "should" get the boot too I don't see how the rejectionator would miss that one.

bvillarreal


quality posts: 0 Private Messages bvillarreal
ermiewormie wrote:I love it. GOOOD LUCK!



Thank you, ermiewormie!

jimiyo


quality posts: 2 Private Messages jimiyo

MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!

http://shirt.woot.com/Derby/Entry.aspx?id=36752

Poraro


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Poraro
Zyphron wrote:you may be pissed but fact is, this shirt was similar in alot of ways to the other.
Sure the concept was different, but it Had rejection all over it from the start.

which leaps into the vacuum because I loved it.

as for the Jetpack. give it time. it "should" get the boot too I don't see how the rejectionator would miss that one.

It had rejection written all over it from the start? Then why didn't shirt.woot reject it before it became so popular? It's ridiculous allowing everyone to get hyped about it for days THEN rejecting it.

clodiaa


quality posts: 0 Private Messages clodiaa
Re: Higher


I based it on the saying "the skys the limit"

EclecticMuse


quality posts: 0 Private Messages EclecticMuse
Oldyeller89 wrote:vectors/pictures, copyright, text, disregard for the rules etc...



But not everyone did that.

Poraro


quality posts: 0 Private Messages Poraro

Also, I wouldn't exactly say the shirts are extremely similar to warrant a rejection. ESPECIALLY since that jetpack shirt is still there.

wugsby


quality posts: 4 Private Messages wugsby
Re: Fail



Resubmit and add some chibi animals, THEN I guarantee woot won't reject it

krwdserfur


quality posts: 0 Private Messages krwdserfur
Re: Fail



oh man, it got rejected?? WHY?????

mrwednesday


quality posts: 12 Private Messages mrwednesday
ramyb wrote:snip



This design is also about 100x more on topic as most of what you submit which is why you get flak and others don't.

That said, I can potentially see where someone would be coming from saying this is off topic but there's only really one argument and no one has made it. That argument would be that the writeup is prompting for things which are inherently grounded unless they are flying. Plane has to take off, bird has to flap its wings, etc. Everything that is "flying" in this design seems pretty permanently in the air. However, it takes an incredibly about of creative interpretation to get that kind of specificity out of what woot wrote and that position is just wrong anyway.

The fish move through the air. Arguably the island moves through the air (the chimney indicates it does, the fishing line indicates it doesn't). There's plenty of flight here. Saying this isn't flight because the island is floating is akin to arguing that any design that shows the ground isn't about flight either. There is no controversy which is why you aren't seeing any, jabberjaws.

mrwednesday


quality posts: 12 Private Messages mrwednesday
jimiyo wrote:MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!
MOST AWESOME DESIGN EVER!

http://shirt.woot.com/Derby/Entry.aspx?id=36752



I guess we know what to expect on Teefury in 60 days.....

mrwednesday


quality posts: 12 Private Messages mrwednesday
Re: Your Time to Fly



I'm really surprised this hasn't been rejected yet.....

All aboard the fail train! woot! woot!

roofoo


quality posts: 0 Private Messages roofoo
Re: Grand Battle of Flightless Birds



I love the illustration, it's witty and well done, personally though it seems a bit busy for a t-shirt.

roofoo


quality posts: 0 Private Messages roofoo
Re: Leonardo Da Vinci's cat



This is awesome! Would totally vote if I could!