Shirt.Woot

in my opinion, this shirt has no importance.
I would give this shirt away if it were mine

MissJamieD wrote:Alright, so now for the perverse hypothesizing: Do you think that the plug is wearing briefs, thong, or g-string? Obviously, with that much sharing, the plug wouldn't be too offended at our discussing.

I'm imagining them somewhat "cheeky", yet maintaining enough coverage so as not to inhibit the imagination. A she-plug who put enough thought into making sure her bra and panties match certainly is anticipating an audience. That little remaining cheek coverage allows her to justify her actions. I have seen this many times on Spring Break trips of my own.

mbowlin21 wrote:in my opinion, this shirt has no importance.
I would give this shirt away if it were mine

[sarcasm=] Good point. Woot shirts have traditionally been judged on their perceived "importance" and this one just doesn't seem to make the cut. [/sarcasm]

shouldn't have needed the text. ruins the shirt for me, although i wouldn't have bought it either way.

i unfortunately believe this was done before, quite similarly

http://fanboys-online.com/index.php?comic=283

wootasourous wrote:G-string is canceled out because there are no strings in the front.

Thong is still in question because thongs can be more brief-like in the front.

Briefs are still in question to...

But I would believe it to be more "cheeky" than anything. Something that would support the plugs supple buttocks. Nothing too showy just something to get a "rise" out of the male plugs.

Or if it going a little plug-curious, maybe even the kitchen sink drain. You never know.

Did you just refer to the plugs supple buttocks? Someone please quality post that, lol!

brendan948725 wrote:I'm imagining them somewhat "cheeky", yet maintaining enough coverage so as not to inhibit the imagination. A she-plug who put enough thought into making sure her bra and panties match certainly is anticipating an audience. That little remaining cheek coverage allows her to justify her actions. I have seen this many times on Spring Break trips of my own.

Where exactly do plugs (and yourself) spring break? =)

MissJamieD wrote:Where exactly do plugs (and yourself) spring break? =)

Apparently woot's plugs are all post-menopausal, so maybe you don't want to know.

what i liked best about Mad magazine's "Horrifying Clichés" were the Paul Coker jr. illustrations... Frankly, this is so weak I doubt he could have saved it, but at least he would have raised it to a higher level of worthlessness.

wootvan wrote:Las Vegas odds just out...over/under on this shirt is 286.

I will give $10 to any grown man I see wearing this shirt out in public.

I mean in person, put your camera phones down...

Now I realize what's wrong with this picture: the plug is a crossdresser; maybe even a jack trapped in a plug's body.

I would like to thank Woot at this time for saving my marriage, when I first started wooting I knew immediately there would be a problem. Shirts arriving every Saturday from the previous derby quickly going into the closet to hang with pride.
However the shine wore off and all I see is garbage in the daily ...we have a saying at home...
there's poo everywhere.
I save $ when poo like this prints

i love it. i'm having one. good to see a matt palmer shirt at last.

Looks more purple than royal blue to me.

This t-shirt needs more decapitations and dinosaur blood.

Ok, I really really don't get it. Am I missing something? Can someone explain it for those as clueless as me?

Cute, but it's not exactly something I'd wear on a shirt.

bassanimation wrote:I will give $10 to any grown man I see wearing this shirt out in public.

I mean in person, put your camera phones down...

You've just sealed your fate. Now every male relative of yours will be sporting one of these at your next family reunion. Well except that they still gotta shell out $10 for the shirts to begin with, and then be seen in public wearing them and all.

But still, would it be worth it to your brothers, uncles, & cousins to collectively drain you of a few hundred bucks while piles of scorn and derision are heaped upon you for instigating this major fashion faux pas?

carrottop4i wrote:Ok, I really really don't get it. Am I missing something? Can someone explain it for those as clueless as me?

Only because you used TWO reallys,

It's a plug running around in its (as someone so poignantly pointed out, this COULD be a cross dresser) bra and panties (although, technically, its running around in its panties, topless).

Therefore, the plug has no shame... OR.. a shameless plug.

Hope that helped :D

parrotworks wrote:Quite embarrassing - your text is showing.

Um yeah, seriously, how come this guy gets away with text on a shirt? I can't think of the last derby that didn't say "no text"...

This should have a giant WOOT! logo on the back

oh... and I think this is in order:
www.bombombombomwooooo.com

Plugs with low self-esteem

MrGromit wrote:This shirt is a good example of why I don't buy "Random Shirts" when they come up.

Seriously, Woot, really?

Maybe I just don't get it.

I was just thinking about how afraid I am of the next random offering.

So for all the dudes looking/wishing/hoping to score with any ladies on spring break.... lol if you wear this shirt you're pretty much guaranteed to fail.

taking a look at my account history, I've been wondering why I haven't wooted a tee lately.

Now I know....what happened to you shirt.woot?

wesshull wrote:Um yeah, seriously, how come this guy gets away with text on a shirt? I can't think of the last derby that didn't say "no text"...

That's derbies. This is a daily. I don't know what rules Woot imposes on daily designs, but there've been plenty of daily shirts with text. (And the derby rule lifts now and then, too. I'm not sure, but the last time might have been National Parks.)

If you need to have an explanation at the bottom it isn't a good pun.

StargateGamingGeek wrote:The quality of the shirts this week has really been spiraling downward. Whether that spiral is clockwise or counter clockwise may or may not be dependent on your present location.

Agreed. =/

Damn, and to think today I forgot all my singles. I wonder what she'll do for a ten? Probably dance shamelessly across my chest.

sad that "y'all" was written "ya'll."

carrottop4i wrote:Ok, I really really don't get it. Am I missing something? Can someone explain it for those as clueless as me?

MissJamieD wrote:Only because you used TWO reallys,

It's a plug running around in its (as someone so poignantly pointed out, this COULD be a cross dresser) bra and panties (although, technically, its running around in its panties, topless).

Therefore, the plug has no shame... OR.. a shameless plug.

Hope that helped :D

Also, since the pun was not spelled out for you as well, a shameless plug is a term for blatant advertising. Mentioning a product or service contiually, wheter or not it is appropriate...kind of like Mario or bunnies (recently banned) appearing in every derby no matter what the theme is.

If the bra was on fire, some cute animal was in the background and it featured Microsoft clip art, then I would buy it =)

now I know what I'd look like with a belly button piercing.

(chubby girl no want)

A shameless pun?

ciabelle wrote:You've just sealed your fate. Now every male relative of yours will be sporting one of these at your next family reunion. Well except that they still gotta shell out $10 for the shirts to begin with, and then be seen in public wearing them and all.

But still, would it be worth it to your brothers, uncles, & cousins to collectively drain you of a few hundred bucks while piles of scorn and derision are heaped upon you for instigating this major fashion faux pas?

Hah, if only my family knew of Woot. Alas, the only thing I think they know of QVC.com and Facebook. Sadness. Also, this shirt would not go well with Ropers....

Why is the title on the shirt?

Dear Woot,

I would like a gallon of eye bleach and my innocence back.

Thank you,
SB

the disappointment of this shirt just dimmed my bright, sun-shiny day...

What a hussy.