Shirt.Woot

AZGman wrote:Then go for the 15-gallon beaverskin Stetson.

mmm... beaver...

no1 wrote:mmm... beaver...

Yeah, I like a little piece of tail every once in a while, myself!!

AZGman wrote:Yeah, I like a little piece of tail every once in a while, myself!!

I prefer it a bit more often then that.

cruzer wrote:I prefer it a bit more often then that.

Enjoy it while you can get it! The rules change soon!!!

AZGman wrote:Enjoy it while you can get it! The rules change soon!!!

Somehow I know that is daj's fault.

Morning all. Interview in T-2 hours.

Tomorrow is worse, tomorrow Orc is taking Ver2 to a follow up appointment for her persistent ear infections and I am at the dentists for an exam to determine how extensive the work I need done is and THEN they are going to see if they can do any of it before the insurance goes bye-bye.

I'm I an spoon for not wanting this job?

dontwantaname wrote:She is 47 and he is close to 60. Why are they having kids?

their meat is more tender.

dontwantaname wrote:The newspaper said John Travolta's dogs were run over and killed at the airport, while they were being walked on a leash. How does that happen?

truck hits dogs. the end.

PemberDucky wrote:Isn't it supposed to happen at least once a year?

shouldn't poofguy be squashing them a leeettle more often than that?

KtCallista wrote:Morning all. Interview in T-2 hours.

Tomorrow is worse, tomorrow Orc is taking Ver2 to a follow up appointment for her persistent ear infections and I am at the dentists for an exam to determine how extensive the work I need done is and THEN they are going to see if they can do any of it before the insurance goes bye-bye.

I'm I an spoon for not wanting this job?

KtC: no - you are not, but at least you are keeping your options/opportunities open!


And I'd be willing to bet that if the Travolta family didn't lose their son, they would probably not be having another one. I saw that about their dogs - how random?! I'm surprised it didn't hit bigger news, since I'm like oh, 100 miles or so away from Bangor!

I'm so out of touch with these things.

Still no news.

But now have an honorary job title that comes with an imaginary cape.

Yay?

dontwantaname wrote:Yes, it would be a replacement child. I guess the nanny will be doing the work.

Ugh, replacement child. Just something doesn't sound right about that. idk.

Mavyn: I'd say any job that includes a cape would be a yay! You are SUPER!

avosgo wrote:And I'd be willing to bet that if the Travolta family didn't lose their son, they would probably not be having another one.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20015264,00.html

"John Travolta & Kelly Preston May Expand Family"

"John Travolta would like to expand his family – if his wife, actress Kelly Preston, will allow it, the actor tells PEOPLE."

dateline Friday March 16, 2007, a coupla years before his son died.

no1 wrote:http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20015264,00.html

"John Travolta & Kelly Preston May Expand Family"

"John Travolta would like to expand his family – if his wife, actress Kelly Preston, will allow it, the actor tells PEOPLE."

dateline Friday March 16, 2007, a coupla years before his son died.

Ok - that sounds a little better. I always thought for an actor/celebrity he seemed like a pretty awesome guy!

dontwantaname wrote:Honorary title and cape? How can you go wrong?

No change in the paycheck?

I shouldn't complain, I got a huge raise to move into this job, but getting the old job 'stuff' back is odd. Better on the resume though, so...more just an oddity than a complaint.

Mavyn wrote:No change in the paycheck?

I shouldn't complain, I got a huge raise to move into this job, but getting the old job 'stuff' back is odd. Better on the resume though, so...more just an oddity than a complaint.

And they gave you no reason that you're getting the old "stuff" back? Maybe it's their way of saying that you did such a good job, only you could get it done!?

avosgo wrote:And they gave you no reason that you're getting the old "stuff" back? Maybe it's their way of saying that you did such a good job, only you could get it done!?

Hard to explain briefly...My former position was an applications developer. My new position is an analyst that builds the solutions. So, old skill set is critical. When I moved jobs, the permissions and tools used for the old job didn't follow, meaning I couldn't do the job fully. Permissions and tools have been granted with the 'honorary' title.

So...the type of work is the same, the specific pages and applications I'll be working on now are completely different.

Mavyn wrote:Hard to explain briefly...My former position was an applications developer. My new position is an analyst that builds the solutions. So, old skill set is critical. When I moved jobs, the permissions and tools used for the old job didn't follow, meaning I couldn't do the job fully. Permissions and tools have been granted with the 'honorary' title.

So...the type of work is the same, the specific pages and applications I'll be working on now are completely different.

Interesting...

Mavyn wrote:Hard to explain briefly...My former position was an applications developer. My new position is an analyst that builds the solutions. So, old skill set is critical. When I moved jobs, the permissions and tools used for the old job didn't follow, meaning I couldn't do the job fully. Permissions and tools have been granted with the 'honorary' title.

So...the type of work is the same, the specific pages and applications I'll be working on now are completely different.

So basically you transitioned from a monkey to someone who can make decisions???

So, if I'm not mistaken, we should all send our good thoughts over to KtC, as this is the time of the phone interview...

Good thoughts ----> KtC

PemberDucky wrote:I'm tired of having to pee all the time!

Hold it longer?

ircmaxell wrote:So basically you transitioned from a monkey to someone who can make decisions???

Sort of...I was in the IT section, working on mostly corporate products, to being in the Operations section, with all custom products.

Mavyn wrote:Sort of...I was in the IT section, working on mostly corporate products, to being in the Operations section, with all custom products.

Ahhh... Well, congrats on the move!

PemberDucky wrote:I'm tired of having to pee all the time!

I'm sure it's common knowledge, but why is it that you have to pee all the time?

PemberDucky wrote:Isn't it supposed to happen at least once a year?

Yes, and she should know that. Seems that year goes by awfully fast, though.

PemberDucky wrote:I'm tired of having to pee all the time!

Pregnant?

Ducklings!!!

pooflady wrote:Pregnant?

Ducklings!!!

That was my first thought too but I didn't want to say it.

her eggo is preggo?

avosgo wrote:So, if I'm not mistaken, we should all send our good thoughts over to KtC, as this is the time of the phone interview...

Thanks!

That's done. It was a bit awkward and we'll see how it goes. They are hiring right away, want someone to start June 13, which is like tomorrow in gov speak.

Why is it my phone only rings when I don't want it to? 2 call waitings during the interview.

KtCallista wrote:Thanks!

That's done. It was a bit awkward and we'll see how it goes. They are hiring right away, want someone to start June 13, which is like tomorrow in gov speak.

Why is it my phone only rings when I don't want it to? 2 call waitings during the interview.

Wow - that is soon! Did they say when they would be making a decision?

Hopefully, they understand during phone interviews that "beeps" do happen!!!

Afternoon.