megsck wrote:they did say it, right in this thread, under the giant letters that say rejected.
what you brought up wasnt evidence, it was simply a design that hasnt been rejected. i wasnt trying to play any guilt card, but i think you are by implying im against someone. what if they get rejected now because you brought up their entry in this thread? whos side do you think he'll take then? (now that is a guilt card)
they say they dont want concepts, but they also say they want TANGIBLE OBJECTS. so this entry still is rejected.
i didnt say your whole post was irrelevant, i said i felt the parts i left out were. the only thing that is relevant is that the rule states they want tangible things, and this isnt tangible, thats it.
Well it seems like it is an impossible argument with you as well. I've stated my reasons why I think the whole rejection is wrong multiple times already, so it seems clear that nothing more I say will convince you unless you haven't read what I wrote before.
Sure, maybe his will get rejected, but aren't you arguing that shirts like his and this one should be rejected??
Let's say his is already rejected. I am arguing so his will not be rejected, which is why (in my opinion) I think he would in turn side for the person defending him.
Many of the parts of the post that you left out were my cross-examining points directly linked to yours through numbering(1.,2.,3., etc) or just in a paragraph located in the same location where you gave a reason it should be rejected. Therefore, it seems like you have run out of arguments (even though you may not have) when these parts are ignored.
hahaha, im sorry, but this is making me laugh. im having a good time, im not in the least getting worked up. *obviously* you missed the fact that i was making a joke.
I'm glad that you are at least having a good time. I'm sorry, but emotions do not translate well over text, which is why from your writing style it seemed to me like you were getting a little flustered.
Surprisingly, sarcasm does not translate well either which is why I guessed you were making a joke, but assumed it was part of your debate and added my bit to it.