Shirt.Woot

What's it say? I can't read math!

Yup-- the math all checks out.

[I actually have no idea, but I'm sure Ian-S did his homework.]

His favorite mathimatical constant is pi

Where's the pic a nic basket?

Is it sad that I actually understand this math?

Bear claws - delicious.

"And that's how you snatch the pic-a-nic basket. Any questions, Boo-Boo?"

Wear this shirt: to your AP phys-a-nics class.

Okay, I came up with my own Wear this shirt, but yours was way better. You guys are frustratingly clever sometimes, Woot writers.

this is horrible.. who will actually wear this? i'm sorry, i'm not usually mean... but 'cmon!!

Haha, differential equations. i think I'm taking this class in the fall.

why are you integrating from 1 to x with respect to x? Oh wait, nevermind, that is 1 over x.
Edit: I can't read half of it. resolution is too low.

shouldn't he be having trouble with calculus since he doesn't brush his teeth. Get it dental calculus? Ugh...

But Yogi, I don't want to go to school today!

jessica9432c wrote:"And that's how you snatch the pic-a-nic basket. Any questions, Boo-Boo?"

"Yes. Don't you mean the pi-ca-nic basket?"

So that's how they almost outsmarted the ranger all those years!

cool for school

paigeorose92 wrote:Is it sad that I actually understand this math?

Imagine getting called out by a fellow math enthusiast while wearing this shirt and you have no clue what the problem means. I still wouldn't wear it though. Way too nerdcore imo.

Well, this makes me glad that I'm doing biology. I can study the bear and forget the math.

Why are all the good shirts OMGOMGOMGPONIESOMG PONIES!!ing green. I have like 10 green ones. I would buy if not green! OMGOMGOMGPONIESOMG PONIES!!!

Cute. And here I sit wondering if I would have gone to more classes if my professors had been bears.

paigeorose92 wrote:Is it sad that I actually understand this math?

Why did he multiply by u(x)?

You know why Yogi and Boo Boo wore ties? It's so the animators could have a nice separation whenever they had to animate the head while the body was stationary or in a cycle. See, it's cheaper to only animate what you have to, so if you can get away with keeping Yogi's body still while only animating his head, the animation is easier and less expensive. So when you give your character a necktie or a bandana, that covers up the fact that there's essentially a seam where one piece of the guy is moving while another piece isn't, and you don't have to worry about weird color fluctuations between the moving parts or body outlines not lining up correctly.

See, and you thought it was 'cause they were just being fashionable. You learned something today.

I thought about making an unbearable pun for the shirt, but then decided against it since the shirt made me laugh.

imsochady wrote:Why did he multiply by u(x)?

u(x) is the integrating factor.

profbrendan wrote:awesome thing about ties

I was thinking to myself "if this doesn't get a quality post, it deserves one." I'm glad woot agreed.

D3lusional wrote:u(x) is the integrating factor.

Yes! thanks for that, I was trying to remember what it is called. Been way too long since I learned it :-/.

Yea man, what is with this these recent shirts? They may have decent art on them but these colors ....yeeea, what a streak

paigeorose92 wrote:Is it sad that I actually understand this math?

Yeah real sad. Being smart isn't cool, don't you know.

If I could choose only two articles of clothing to wear, they would have to be a hat and tie. What could be more essential?

I briefly thought this shirt would be nice for my vacation in the Smokies net month.. But two nagging problems emerged..
1) I have no clue what that is on the blackboard, and
2) Black bears are much more likely to be encountered than brown bears.

So there's two ways that I could be called out by wearing this shirt.

D3lusional wrote:u(x) is the integrating factor.

Oh shnaps! Now I remember, haha!

Love the title! I say that frequently and people of a certain age don't have a clue as to what I mean.

chrisprender wrote:Yup-- the math all checks out.

[I actually have no idea, but I'm sure Ian-S did his homework.]

Actually, isn't the e^1/2x^2 term after the C coefficient at the very end incorrect? Doesn't this term stay entirely outside in front of the integral in the final step (as shown)?...

I hope I am incorrect and the last step is correct as shown, but if not then this shirt is sure to draw comments from the geekdom....

JCamp4321 wrote:Actually, isn't the e^1/2x^2 term after the C coefficient at the very end incorrect? Doesn't this term stay entirely outside in front of the integral in the final step (as shown)?...

I hope I am incorrect and the last step is correct as shown, but if not then this shirt is sure to draw comments from the geekdom....

The +C is outside of the integral (in my experience the +C is often not added until the integral has been calculated, but either way, it's separate), so it's like

e^1/2x^2 * (Integral + C)
but worked out to
e^1/2x^2 * Integral + e^1/2x^2 * C

JCamp4321 wrote:Actually, isn't the e^1/2x^2 term after the C coefficient at the very end incorrect? Doesn't this term stay entirely outside in front of the integral in the final step (as shown)?...

I hope I am incorrect and the last step is correct as shown, but if not then this shirt is sure to draw comments from the geekdom....

Plug it back in two steps back, and you return a true statement. The step is valid provided you do not pop a C when you actually integrate the final term. Unfortunately as written here, you could pop another constant, as the derivative of the last integral term would nullify it. However that wouldn't matter: if you take new constant D and old constant C, as the will both be multiplied by the same factor, you can combine the two to achieve new constant scrote. Plugging the equation back in with the scrote included gives a true statement.

Essentially: There's potentially two constants, but you can combine them to form scrote.

for some reason the geographic distribution of "wooters wooting" this shirt does not surprise me.

one might find themselves bearly astonished.

It's legit, a classic first-order Differential equation.

If I buy one do you promise not to follow through with your idea for a rabbit, dwarf procotologist?

pinchecat wrote:for some reason the geographic distribution of "wooters wooting" this shirt does not surprise me.

one might find themselves bearly astonished.

Aren't they still sleeping on the west coast?