Re: a lot in common
You need to explain this to me. I'm pretty sure it would be the kind of thing I'd like, if only I were smarter.
Re: a lot in common
You need to explain this to me. I'm pretty sure it would be the kind of thing I'd like, if only I were smarter.
BootsBoots wrote:You need to explain this to me. I'm pretty sure it would be the kind of thing I'd like, if only I were smarter.
it's a joke on DNA ![]()
jesseroo wrote:it's a joke on DNA
Ohhh. I get it now. ![]()
BootsBoots wrote:Ohhh. I get it now.
Hmmm. Took more than 3 seconds though ;)
Re: a lot in common
+1
Re: a lot in common
Love the joke!
Re: a lot in common
So many good things in this derby.
Re: a lot in common
You pulled my first ever comment on these pages. Dead frakking brill!
But how in blazes did you get Inigo Montoya's DNA code? ;-)
Re: a lot in common
Re: a lot in common
so heady! I love it!
Re: a lot in common
I like this one, but I'm worried the text will be too small on the shirt and just look like scribbles.
Re: a lot in common
+1 on this one. That is basically enough DNA for a unicellular being.
mardigraw wrote:+1 on this one. That is basically enough DNA for a unicellular being.
Hardly! That's only enough to code for a single polypeptide approximately 120 units in length, if each codon was translated. However, the first start codon isn't until halfway through the first row, and it reaches a stop codon after only four frames. There may be more, but I didn't bother to check. The point is, you'd need thousands of times this amount of DNA for even the simplest organism. Nevertheless, this is quite amusing.
Good one Parrotworks!
Re: a lot in common
You broke the cardinal rule of shirt design! Again! ;) Actually, I'm sure more science-minded people would get it immediately. It's been awhile since I've seen the TCAG's. Glad it's doing well for you. ![]()
Re: a lot in common
Super cute. Does it code for an actual gene, or did you just type a bunch of AGCTs? If I weren't so lazy, I'd BLAST it myself.
BootsBoots wrote:Glad it's doing well for you.
Er..Uuh..Thanks.
Re: a lot in common
this stuff is more Biology than Chemistry I think
Re: a lot in common
I loved it as soon as I saw it. Want.
P.S. There are so many awesome shirts this derby!! But only 3 will print :'(
Re: a lot in common
Funny AND intellectually stimulating! GMV.
Re: a lot in common
Hahaha, Great concept :D
chade2001 wrote:this stuff is more Biology than Chemistry I think
yep. good job. i actually lol'd for real.
Love it! GMV...I really hope this prints. Now I easily weed out my dumb friends! (j/k...I need a few dumb friends to make me look smarter. :D )
chade2001 wrote:this stuff is more Biology than Chemistry I think
All biology has its basis in chemistry, and DNA is the ultimate biochemical compound. It is the instruction set from which every other biochemical process in the body ultimately derives, be it metabolism, respiration, brain function, etc. And you cannot see it in this representation, but between each of those ACT&G's is a chemical (phosphodiester) bond.
Yup, chemistry at its most eloquent.
(Can you tell that I am a molecular biologist by trade?)
notnas wrote:Super cute. Does it code for an actual gene, or did you just type a bunch of AGCTs? If I weren't so lazy, I'd BLAST it myself.
Haha, I was going to do the same thing. I would have used BLAST from wormbase to see if it was a C. elegans gene
Re: a lot in common
Ugh! You ALMOST had "GATTACA" in there, you've got GATTAGA, so I can just paint out part of the G. Still want. Hope it prints.
This would be perfect when I talk about DNA with my students! Love it!
Re: a lot in common
I am very sad that this didn't win