Derby #213: Dog Days

Big Red's gonna blow

No

Rejected because: No

add a comment

Comments

leopoldmozart


quality posts: 7 Private Messages leopoldmozart
Re: Big Red's gonna blow


No. Just no.

yankeebird


quality posts: 7 Private Messages yankeebird
leopoldmozart wrote:No. Just no.


But for which reason? The too many colors, violating copyright, or general grossness of the topic?

kyle1020


quality posts: 0 Private Messages kyle1020

Violating copyright? Really? Because woot has never done that before, ever...

kyle1020


quality posts: 0 Private Messages kyle1020
Re: Big Red's gonna blow


Also...he's peeing. Well he's going to. Hence the small fire hydrant underneath him. You can't see it bc I tried following woof's guidelines and ended up with small pictures, next time I'll try to make the design big enough so as not to confuse people.

yankeebird


quality posts: 7 Private Messages yankeebird
kyle1020 wrote:Violating copyright? Really? Because woot has never done that before, ever...


So if they've messed up in the past, that makes it OK to intentionally do it in this situation? There's a big difference between parody and what you've done, which is copy Clifford exactly. There's also a big difference between implying a character (ala Cookie Monster in "The Binge" and this, which leaves nothing to your imagination to decide who it is).

kyle1020


quality posts: 0 Private Messages kyle1020

Yeah yeah. Because I've never seen darth vader or anyone copied directly. Oh wait, yes i have. It's not intentional I guess. And sorry if not everyone makes perfect designs. We make mistakes, now I know. Next time I promise to imply copyright infringement mommy. Thank you for being right up my butt on this one.

yankeebird


quality posts: 7 Private Messages yankeebird
kyle1020 wrote:Yeah yeah. Because I've never seen darth vader or anyone copied directly. Oh wait, yes i have. It's not intentional I guess. And sorry if not everyone makes perfect designs. We make mistakes, now I know. Next time I promise to imply copyright infringement mommy. Thank you for being right up my butt on this one.



Well, with an attitude like that, I can promise you if you ever do follow the rules, you won't get a vote or purchase out of me. Part of woot is how you handle yourself, and calling me mommy and saying I'm up your butt isn't really endearing. Constructive or not, you better learn to deal with criticism without resorting to name-calling.

With that out of the way - can you show me where someone copied Darth Vader directly? There was a recent Darth print, but it was very clearly PARODY. If you can't differentiate between how that was parody and yours isn't, you may need to review the concept. That's some constructive criticism. ;)

kyle1020


quality posts: 0 Private Messages kyle1020

It must be that time of the month. How about you go unconstructively criticize someone else's shirt design. This one's already been rejected! so you no longer need to obsess over it, or me. Good day.

lozerette


quality posts: 2 Private Messages lozerette
kyle1020 wrote:It must be that time of the month. How about you go unconstructively criticize someone else's shirt design. This one's already been rejected! so you no longer need to obsess over it, or me. Good day.


...a bit touchy, are we? I believe yankee is trying to *help* your future submissions by helping you understand why this one may have been rejected. No need to get so upset...

More Derby Entries

By date:

By rank:

Thumbnail