Re: Take This
THIS! This is awesome, and reminds me of the first time I played the original.
Derby #254: Trompe-l'œil
+286
Take This
add a comment
Comments
- Jun 1, 2012 11:00 PM
- permalink
- Jun 1, 2012 11:25 PM
- permalink
Re: Take This
This is another Tough one. Awesome design. But the Fire is graphic, not realistic, which ruins the "illusion of 3D". The sword does feel like it's coming closer though. I would buy this (if I could wear anvil), but is it Trompe-l'œil.
Numquam minoris aestimo potentia stultis, maxime in magna coetus
------------------------------------
■(1:40 PM, 7/27/2012) bounty42 quips, "Forget Guest Editor, what we need is a Guest Rejectionator."
■(10:40 AM, 6/21/2012 ) bounty42 inquires, "Is it just me, or do we not typically get this many Editors Choice shirts?"
■(2:02 PM, 6/15/2012) bounty42 runs numbers.
■(10:40 AM, 6/7/2012) bounty42 dispenses wisdom for all those 'too late' naysayers, "A woot shirt is never late, nor is it early, it arrives precisely when it means to."
■(3:20 PM, 5/18/2012) bounty42 states, "The turtle is very cute, and I love the smug look he's got."
- Jun 1, 2012 11:36 PM
- permalink
Re: Take This
This is absolutely STUNNING work! The perspective on the sword is right on the nose.
- Jun 1, 2012 11:44 PM
- permalink
bounty42 wrote:This is another Tough one. Awesome design. But the Fire is graphic, not realistic, which ruins the "illusion of 3D". The sword does feel like it's coming closer though. I would buy this (if I could wear anvil), but is it Trompe-l'œil.
The sword is definitely Trompe-l'œil! The entire image doesn't have to be,in fact most peoples designs aren't entirely that one perspective.
- Jun 3, 2012 1:27 AM
- permalink
Re: Take This
I agree that the flames detract from the perspective you gained with the sword. My other issue is that though it's a cool looking design, I don't see any parody here that would make this fair use.
- Jun 3, 2012 6:23 AM
- permalink
Just use your imagination
[/url]
[/url]
mrwednesday wrote:I agree that the flames detract from the perspective you gained with the sword. My other issue is that though it's a cool looking design, I don't see any parody here that would make this fair use.
- Jun 3, 2012 6:24 PM
- permalink
mrwednesday wrote:I agree that the flames detract from the perspective you gained with the sword. My other issue is that though it's a cool looking design, I don't see any parody here that would make this fair use.
<.< >.> Looks like Zelda/DBZ Roshi...
- Jun 4, 2012 9:03 PM
- permalink
Re: Take This
officeink wrote:The sword is definitely Trompe-l'œil! The entire image doesn't have to be,in fact most peoples designs aren't entirely that one perspective.
Yes it does. The fact the Rejectionator hasn't shown up for 4 days, and most people aren't on topic, doesn't mean the topic isn't here or shouldn't apply. It's like saying beating someone with a stick is ok, because you only hit them in the stomache, and other people were using tire irons.
mrwednesday wrote:I agree that the flames detract from the perspective you gained with the sword. My other issue is that though it's a cool looking design, I don't see any parody here that would make this fair use.
I'm not up on how much of the imagery from the game is trademarked, but I think the elements that are visible in the image may not be sufficient grounds for a challenge. It looks as much like an 80s metal album cover as a piece of Zelda art.
trulyepic wrote:Just use your imagination
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1w7vwPgAp1qztwte.gif
I'm assuming this is talking about the comments about the non Trompe-l'œil nature of the flames. You can't see it but I'm giving you the stink-eye. That's the single most trollish thing I've read today.
Numquam minoris aestimo potentia stultis, maxime in magna coetus
------------------------------------
■(1:40 PM, 7/27/2012) bounty42 quips, "Forget Guest Editor, what we need is a Guest Rejectionator."
■(10:40 AM, 6/21/2012 ) bounty42 inquires, "Is it just me, or do we not typically get this many Editors Choice shirts?"
■(2:02 PM, 6/15/2012) bounty42 runs numbers.
■(10:40 AM, 6/7/2012) bounty42 dispenses wisdom for all those 'too late' naysayers, "A woot shirt is never late, nor is it early, it arrives precisely when it means to."
■(3:20 PM, 5/18/2012) bounty42 states, "The turtle is very cute, and I love the smug look he's got."
- Jun 4, 2012 10:53 PM
- permalink
mrchia wrote:THIS! This is awesome, and reminds me of the first time I played the original.
Thanks alot. I was trying to get that feel
- Jun 4, 2012 10:54 PM
- permalink
noxandpy wrote:This is absolutely STUNNING work! The perspective on the sword is right on the nose.
Thanks for liking my submission
- Jun 4, 2012 10:55 PM
- permalink
officeink wrote:The sword is definitely Trompe-l'œil! The entire image doesn't have to be,in fact most peoples designs aren't entirely that one perspective.
Thank You
- Jun 4, 2012 10:55 PM
- permalink
omarfeliciano wrote:Epic
Thanks.
- Jun 4, 2012 10:56 PM
- permalink
samuraiexx wrote:Awesome
Thanks dude.
- Jun 4, 2012 11:14 PM
- permalink
bounty42 wrote:I'm assuming this is talking about the comments about the non Trompe-l'œil nature of the flames. You can't see it but I'm giving you the stink-eye. That's the single most trollish thing I've read today.
I'm afraid your assumption was mistaken. I was referring to the comment about fair use. The flame is clearly graphic and not realistic, that much is obvious. The matter of it being fair use on the other hand is open for debate. A use of ones imagination to see potential parodies or mashups is essential as you demonstrated by comparing it to an 80's metal album cover. I did not mean to be "trollish," only slightly humorous. Humor is a subjective thing it seems, so I will apologize for my attempt.
Good Day to you sir.
Thumbnail
