Re: Schrodinger's Human

The X's being used for eyes might be counted as text (has been reason to reject in other derbies).

Mavyn wrote:The X's being used for eyes might be counted as text (has been reason to reject in other derbies).

Valid point. I hadn't considered that because my thought process wasn't equating them as text.

I'll just wait and see what happens.

tjschaeffer wrote:Valid point. I hadn't considered that because my thought process wasn't equating them as text.

I'll just wait and see what happens.

no freaking way.... X shaped eyes are a common way to draw hit/killed characters in mange, video games and other genres of art. So what? if I paint a vest or shoes where the lacing is made of X's thats also gonna be rejected cuz of text? im sorry but there has to be a cap to how far it can get with the whole text thing. I will bet we can all see the whole alphabet made of shapes in other works too if we really wanted to.. if it gets rejected cuz of that, that would be just Ok, I love you, buh-bye!.

Re: Schrodinger's Human

Yeah, the rejectionator can be fickle with certain things, X's for eyes have been rejected before and probably let slide in other instances. You never know.

Re: Schrodinger's Human

Well, I'm glad it didn't get rejected for the eyes. Sad that it has such a low vote total, though. Oh well.