raindog469 wrote:Don't look now, but the people who buy stuff on Woot (and actually, the interwebs in general) aren't what you would call "the beautiful people".
BootsBoots, Jewelwing, TheJakey188, and Sokowa would disagree, and that's just a small sampling. (Jakey isn't a designer, but he has so many shirt pics ;) ) Don't generalize and say that people online aren't "the beautiful people". At least 4 of the many photos I could dig up say otherwise.
raindog469 wrote:Would have bought this if it were a black shirt. I was thinking of ripping the design off and making myself a one-off shirt on CP, but if I'm going to infringe someone's copyright I guess I'd just as soon do something more clever.
Rip off the design, and I hope woot comes after you with a lawsuit, since they own the design.
raindog469 wrote:To the guy who suggested that making the shirt royal blue instead of black was an elegant way to keep it down to two colors, er, one of the two colors is black.
And I'm not a guy. I'd have thought my icon would prove otherwise, but if that can't get it through to you, maybe this can.
As for making the shirt on black, the amount of detail that would have been illustrated in blue would be too much and ruin the simplicity. Sure, it can be done, but the point of designing it this way is to show how the negative becomes the piece.