JadenKale wrote:Hmmm... Considering that probably 95% of posts revolve around design ideas, genuine critiques and suggestions, thank yous for voting on my entries
All fairly reasonable things to mention.
JadenKale wrote:and just your regular blah blah blah about random topics (such as food and leakfrogs)
/quote]Why, heavens! those have SUCH an importance that they have to be read in the shirt.woot! page. Hmmm - does this mean that you can buy leakfrogs on shirt.woot!? I never knew that. Thanks for the tip!
[quote postid="3137155" user="JadenKale"]
I quite enjoy the fact that you focus on that 5% of my less appreciated posts.
Huh? Where did I focus on that? I mean, I'm glad you enjoy my focus on something (maybe), but I'm utterly clueless about what you are bringing up here.
No one is perfect or a fricken ray of sunshine all the time, so I wouldn't be shining your halo so soon, if I were you.
I don't happen to recall on my making my self-appreciation quite so obvious. In fact, I don't remember writing pretty much anything positive about myself other than to give an example of graphics I've done immediately after someone has (yet again) blasted me for no doubt being jealous of not being able to get a t-shirt on auction. Of course, the problem here is that I'm not the least bit interested in that. So: the point here is that (a) I don't care about getting a shirt "published" and hadn't even thought about the topic until you brought it up and (b) one needn't be successful at getting a shirt "published" to be successful at being able to produce some an item of at least moderately decent graphic art.
This forum isn't the ultimate arbiter of the world of graphic art, I reckon.
JadenKale wrote:You seem to be the only one hellbent on pointing out my post amount
Yep. I am. In fact, I'd like to know what the average number of posts is for anyone in the community other than yourself. Basically, you appear to be a statistical outlier - I just don't think that your count is anywhere CLOSE to being average. Or "average" if you prefer.
JadenKale wrote:When the average is approximately 16 posts a day (if that), that seems a lot less extreme.
What an interesting way of defending yourself. Of course, since you were the ONLY person at whom I directed an ad hominem attack, I'm not the least surprised that you'd give any argument you could (like "well, I'm not posting an EXTREME number of articles a day")
You ARE posting an extreme number of articles a day, OK? Not necessarily a good thing or a bad thing, just something that seems to indicate that you feel a need to do so.
Actually, you would have been far better off if you had either ignored my comment OR, failing that show that I was making the error of an ad-hominem attack.
You'd needed only point out that my note was obviously irrelevant and only a jerk would have written it.
So why are you so busy defending yourself if you truly do not believe that you need to do so? Honestly, why even waste your time?
(entering total rocket scientist mode) Oh! I see! it is in order to further inflate your post count!(leaving total rocket scientist mode)
Yeah, I'd probably leave a smiley here if I happened to like them, but I'm absolutely certain that you'd think it to be facetious.