TnBill47
quality posts: 1
Private Messages
SecretAgentWoman wrote:I was told there would be no math...
Chevy Chase as Pres. Gerald Ford on Saturday Night Live, vintage '76?
First WOOT 10/4/04, Total WOOTs 250+ </smart>
TnBill47
quality posts: 1
Private Messages
Darquis wrote:I think I can explain the fire - it's representational of heating the delicious reagents. It isn't meant to suggest you actually have fire as an ingredient.
As this is the simplified form of the smore equation (after all, we don't deal with chocolate brand coefficients or graham cracker isotopes) the duration and temperature aren't included - so be careful if you attempt to recreate this experiment! Always be sure to wear the appropriate safety equipment.
{Trying to remember Chemistry 101}
Isn't there a representation for a catalyst in a chemical reaction? Besides, I would think that a set of simultaneous multivariate equations would better represent the process... [/nitpick]
First WOOT 10/4/04, Total WOOTs 250+ </smart>