Shirt.Woot

Re: Sticking Out

Sea urchins and hedgehogs?! I'm sold!

Assassin15 wrote:Why didn't the astronauts in 1969 bring golf clubs to the moon?! It'd be the best place ever to go golfing!

they did...

stormygoddess wrote:walmazan and bootsboots, the perfect pair! Love it, GMV

well done a really good combination of styles
GMV

AdderXYU wrote:I cannot imagine a better venue for this shirt to print.

Rejection: woot reference.

Re: How low can you go?

Very original! Love the idea. GMV, good luck!

Re: The Smart Cookie

confound it! I had to buy Lotus Dream from the last derby. Now this! I will have to buy it as well - just too cute and well-designed to pass up.
Love it!

The oblivious ones are the tastiest!

Re: Ready for takeoff

Boris doesn't realize that he's not fooling anyone...

Re: bottom right?...

a bit strapped for time so its not a super crazy illo but i thought the concept was kinda funny. hope you guys dig it.

Re: AHH it's a mutant!

The carapace above the four heads gives a hunchback appearance. Is that supposed to be part of the mutation?

cindyscrazy wrote:My hedgie just passed away....this shirt just brought a tear to my eye :'(

Awww. I'm sorry to hear that.

Re: One does not simply

This is great!

Re: The Smart Cookie

I need to own this shirt!

Re: I SEE LONDON, I SEE FRANCE, WAIT WHAT?

I think this is far less effective on this color. I liked the retro feel the comp in the thread WAY better.

ThunderThighs wrote:Makes me think of Baby Huey.

More like
*takes off sunglasses*
Baby KABLOOEY.

kaseyfleming wrote:a bit strapped for time so its not a super crazy illo but i thought the concept was kinda funny. hope you guys dig it.

Haha! Sorry you didn't have time to flesh it out a bit more. Love the concept and it totally takes the "Which one of these is not like the others," to a Cthulu level that was sorely lacking.

Re: Self Portrait

Nice work, reminds me of Jeremy Fish.

Re: happiness

Social commentary! I like!

Re: A Guide for the Good Guys. Villains are obvious.

I still don't like faces on shirts but I loved monocle guy from the train drawing you had months ago, so this gets an auto-vote.

Shadowhunter312 wrote:With Ramyb, it's turtles all the way down.

Bwahahah *sigh* I am literally laughing out loud at this!

To make my post some what relevant, I think that the turtle thing is the reason this isn't in the fog right now. It's getting a bit old, and this is (minus the harebunnies) is three turtle subs in a row for Ramyb. Even the fans get tired of the same thing.

i can't vote - i am not feeling too well - i am suffering from turtleitis lol

Re: Sticking Out

Too cute for me to wear, but I do really like it. Maybe for my girl...

Re: BAD MOTHERDUCKER

THE DUCK IS BACK!

profbrendan wrote:More like
*takes off sunglasses*
Baby KABLOOEY.

YEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

lin13 wrote:blech, that jpeg doesn't look good! Sorry everyone, first submission.

Try saving as a PNG file next time. Comes out a lot cleaner.

Re: AHH it's a mutant!

Maybe it's just me, but something about the angle of the bo staff, and the expression on the second turtle-head's face, give the impression that the mutant is doing something inappropriate to itself ...

BootsBoots wrote:Walmazan and Boots collab.

I heard from a source that there are some nude photos of the meanest cupcake floating around that would bring her down a peg.

Re: Phoenix on a wire

Wow, great idea!

Re: hear no evil, see n - oh god, Ted has gone crazy!

oh, YES!

Re: Poo-too-weet

This is out of the fog?!

mindputtee wrote:
Also, about the concerns of this getting rejected on the grounds of TMNT and video games, that's total crap, this design doesn't reference TMNT at all, yes it's a mutant turtle but that concept is not owned by TMNT. This is a completely independent idea, even if it does play on people's nostalgia for TMNT.

While I generally stay out of these things, I'd have to disagree about that.

1) It's called a mutant in the title.
2) It has ninja weaponry.
3) It has four heads.
ergo, TMNT.

One point of the previous comment was that OTHER designs were rejected for video games because the rejectorationers felt that they were about TMNJ. I don't believe that discussing this possible rejection case is out of line. Why would woot NOT reject this if they rejected the previous design that seems to meet the same 'video game' criteria as this one?

Re: AHH it's a mutant!

Ok, I still dislike this turtle, and the style in general. But I gotta give you props for sticking by your guns, dude. Rollin' with the punches: ramyb.

Re: happiness

I SO feel this. Just wish it wasn't on white. But I know white is your canvas of choice. I can deal.

kylemittskus wrote:This is out of the fog?!

Not for long.


Also, I like the duality of a machine playing with a flying life form, while a life form plays with a flying machine.

jasneko wrote:"What's with the black spots? And take a look at his lunch!"

Both alluding to the controversy of the panda being a bear (some scientists debate that it is in the raccoon family rather than bear), as well as having the 'different' lunch at the cafeteria table... have you ever been that kid?

Molecular and genetic studies suggest that the giant panda is indeed a true bear (family Ursidae), and the "raccoon debate" has died down significantly in the past several years.

I think this is a pretty cute design, by the way.

Re: saved by the bun

Hey, now - I had a BAG phone.
Only question - where is jheri-curl's right hand?

Re: how's that for luck?

This came out slick. +1

Re: The Smart Cookie

you two blend well =) +1