j5 wrote:I agree this looks like patrickspens' work, but is style even copyrightable? I know "look and feel" wasn't. How can it be considered stealing even if radscoolian intentionally tried to copy someone else's style? (which I don't think he did)
It is unethical to most the art world. I really don't mean to be a jerk and I am not trying to get it rejected, but it's just too close to comfort for me not too question it. You are right, it may not be intentional, but if it is, it is a very wrong, even if copyright rules don't apply. It's just a lack of respect. I understand that people may think differently, so I will just stop here so I don't derail this thread more than I have already.