quality posts: 4
Like the changes, hope that maybe someday I will get to be a guest judge
106 Woots to date across all sites (now Woot! says I am better than everyone else) including 6 Bags of Crap...snagged a Badgers or Chipmunks to secure my black square!
quality posts: 22
Change is good. Will be interesting to see how this shakes out, but first thought? Really off putting to see all the people 'volunteering' to be a guest judge.
The community has lost so many of the artists contributions and voices. I hope that this can bring them back.
My speech is not parsing. I am speaking in ellipsis.
quality posts: 15
I think I'm going to stand along as the curmudgeon who doesn't this this is going to solve the issues people think it will. While freeing 2 of the votes from the straight jacket of "last in" voting issues, I think tjost's 2nd place shirt with a Tuesday Noon submission stamp proves that for a truely good design, this isn't as big of an issue.
Also, while this might open up the field a little to the "less popular" artists, the people who print aren't just popular with the voters, but with the editors as well. I've got the feeling that 1 of the 2 editor selections is still going to be one of the top pool people, every week, and I'd be surprised if we ever see a shirt below 15th or so get a slot.
I'm also wondering if anyones loosed at Editor's Choice sales vs. 2nd Chance Derby Winner sales.
Numquam minoris aestimo potentia stultis, maxime in magna coetus
■(1:40 PM, 7/27/2012) bounty42 quips, "Forget Guest Editor, what we need is a Guest Rejectionator."
■(10:40 AM, 6/21/2012 ) bounty42 inquires, "Is it just me, or do we not typically get this many Editors Choice shirts?"
■(2:02 PM, 6/15/2012) bounty42 runs numbers.
■(10:40 AM, 6/7/2012) bounty42 dispenses wisdom for all those 'too late' naysayers, "A woot shirt is never late, nor is it early, it arrives precisely when it means to."
■(3:20 PM, 5/18/2012) bounty42 states, "The turtle is very cute, and I love the smug look he's got."