quality posts: 2
I just think it's interesting that no one hates it (yet). You'd think someone would just give them a hard time for the heck of it.
I put chemicals in your food... seriously
quality posts: 1
Anything that will end the monopoly of awful hacks is fine by me.
Number of shirt.woots in 08: 23 (not counting randoms and shirts bought for friends)
number of shirt.woots in 09: 2 (same criteria)
quality posts: 105
kevlar51 wrote:Maybe even a quick discussion on what worked well with the selected design?
That sounds like a great learning experience.
I'm just hanging out, really.
quality posts: 15
Echoing what I said elsewhere.
I think a lot of people are seeing this as a "monopoly breaker" that see about 70% of the prints going to about 10 artists.
And I think we're going to start seeing Editor's picking prints by those same 10 artists about 70% of the time.
I predict a Firestorm the first time Ramyb wins a 2nd or 3rd place.
Also, we need a name change, because they aren't 1st, 2nd, 3rd anymore. They're Peoples Choice, Editor's Choice, and Celeb Guest's Choice.
Numquam minoris aestimo potentia stultis, maxime in magna coetus
■(1:40 PM, 7/27/2012) bounty42 quips, "Forget Guest Editor, what we need is a Guest Rejectionator."
■(10:40 AM, 6/21/2012 ) bounty42 inquires, "Is it just me, or do we not typically get this many Editors Choice shirts?"
■(2:02 PM, 6/15/2012) bounty42 runs numbers.
■(10:40 AM, 6/7/2012) bounty42 dispenses wisdom for all those 'too late' naysayers, "A woot shirt is never late, nor is it early, it arrives precisely when it means to."
■(3:20 PM, 5/18/2012) bounty42 states, "The turtle is very cute, and I love the smug look he's got."