Shirt.Woot

I thought that this was going to be a shirt about Eskrima

I hate Pandas.

Slow posting tonight.

I am Psychic!! I forsee this as a topselling kids shirt. Cuz if you are a man and caught wearing this, you have to give up your Man Card.

I thought it was a pirate dog at first.

And yeah, I've actually had a hard time accepting our pop culture celebration of pirates. They weren't/aren't nice people. I suppose it's just more proof that the Hollywood entertainment industry can glamorize and turn anything family friendly!

I thought that was a picture of Teemo... Bummer

Wish the artwork was on the back of the shirt

Was I the only one that thought of Google when I seen this shirt??

safyrejet wrote:I thought it was a pirate dog at first.

I know what it's not, it's not a Fox.

Congrats on your first print BLB!

If that's a baboon skull on his hat, then I love this.

I still have yet to contact customer service about this (lazy? maybe) but if you haven't ever bought a shirt here before, be careful of the sizes. I bought 2 shirts now in the youth size 6 for my son and they are both extremely short and extremely W-I-D-E. I'd like to send them back but the postage alone would be more than the cost of the Tshirt. I'm not buying another shirt from woot again (gave them 2 shots at it). Or at the very least, not until my son gets old enough to wear a large size and I can try a different size out. Just my $.05 worth (inflation).

atomic punk wrote:I still have yet to contact customer service about this (lazy? maybe) but if you haven't ever bought a shirt here before, be careful of the sizes. I bought 2 shirts now in the youth size 6 for my son and they are both extremely short and extremely W-I-D-E. I'd like to send them back but the postage alone would be more than the cost of the Tshirt. I'm not buying another shirt from woot again (gave them 2 shots at it). Or at the very least, not until my son gets old enough to wear a large size and I can try a different size out. Just my $.05 worth (inflation).

FYI, Woot customer service doesn't ask for the shirts back. They are pretty good about making things right. The kid's sizes are pretty wonk. Maybe a ladie's small would work as they are longer.

That's a rather depressing write up. :-/

My first DAILY print. Thanks for all your support. Yeah, the write-up was a bit bleak... But the truth often is.

j5 wrote:FYI, Woot customer service doesn't ask for the shirts back. They are pretty good about making things right. The kid's sizes are pretty wonk. Maybe a ladie's small would work as they are longer.

Yes, you can always contact them at support@woot.com if you need to chat with them about it some more.

Yeah man, pirates didn't feast around IRL. The fantasy version is fun, but not realistic. And I don't think it's particularly dark pointing that out. I think that people probably don't want to know what Ninja were like IRL either. :P

gusvonpooch wrote:Wish the artwork was on the back of the shirt

YES! What is with all these shirts these days with the art on the front? T-shirts should have the "main" art/poster on the back and a logo/art reference where the pocket should be on the front.

basfiji wrote:Was I the only one that thought of Google when I seen this shirt??

Perhaps. I thought of Sons of Anarchy.

spiderdad wrote:That's a rather depressing write up. :-/

I rather liked it. Informative and kind of funny, if you don't take it too seriously.

workinpoor wrote:YES! What is with all these shirts these days with the art on the front? T-shirts should have the "main" art/poster on the back and a logo/art reference where the pocket should be on the front.

"Occupy the T-shirt!"

This belongs on a shelf right next to a vegetarian, vampire bunny.

workinpoor wrote:YES! What is with all these shirts these days with the art on the front? T-shirts should have the "main" art/poster on the back and a logo/art reference where the pocket should be on the front.

Agreed,I'm tired of wearing my Woot shirts backwards,I get a neck rash.

lstaff wrote:"Occupy the T-shirt!"

I'll "back" this idea ! I'm sure I would buy more shirts with that option.

? Artwork on the back? Can someone explain that appeal? I really don't get why that would be preferred. I can understand that for concert shirts where they put the list of locations on the back, for specific logo/company style shirts, or for a few designs, like that shhh ninja. But I really prefer the art on front of the shirt, I mean I can see it there and it doesn't get covered all day by my backpack, overshirt, jacket, chairback, etc...Art on the back shirts are a waste of time to me 'cause I miss out on seeing that cute/cool/nerdy design that I'm wearing.

You know, if you flip the little skull on the hat around, it looks like a sad kitten with a tattoo on it's forehead...

safyrejet wrote:? Artwork on the back? Can someone explain that appeal? I really don't get why that would be preferred. I can understand that for concert shirts where they put the list of locations on the back, for specific logo/company style shirts, or for a few designs, like that shhh ninja. But I really prefer the art on front of the shirt, I mean I can see it there and it doesn't get covered all day by my backpack, overshirt, jacket, chairback, etc...Art on the back shirts are a waste of time to me 'cause I miss out on seeing that cute/cool/nerdy design that I'm wearing.

I'm completely with you on this one. Right now my hair would cover half of the design on the back, too. As it is, it covers some of the front designs and would cover pocket-located prints, too. Design on the front is as it should be. Carry on, Woot! Carry on!

Speed to First Woot: 2m 4.440s
First Sucker: branchero
Last Wooter to Woot: minipando
Last Purchase:6 minutes ago
Order Pace (rank):
Bottom 0% of Shirt Woots
Bottom 0% of all Woots
Woots Sold: 888


First day sales 888
First day posts 26