Shirt.woot launches a new original t-shirt design every midnight(central). After that spotlight, the shirt enters The Reckoning, our top 20 best selling shirts.

the derbyDerby #117: HalloweenZombie Candycorn

Zombie Candycorn

+1522 / 1st

 

Comments

+ add a comment

fablefire


Quality Posts:
8

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


"Zombie Candycorn"

mrwednesday


Quality Posts:
6

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


It's as if the candy corn were cannibals.....

sakleehop


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


O.M.G. - this is too cute for words. Seems so obvious, plus I never liked candy corn - neither candy nor corn. Love it!!

DianaSprinkle


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Woooo! I really like this one! I'm a sucker for iconic shirt designs. =D

Kebeca1690


Quality Posts:
0

send message

I like the candy corn tees

bennydougs


Quality Posts:
0

send message

rglee129


Quality Posts:
7

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


That's pretty darn clever.

billratio


Quality Posts:
1

send message

rglee129 wrote:That's pretty darn clever.


i'd eat them too


check out my band
www.soundclick.com/thelegendofkong

jasneko


Quality Posts:
11

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


HA. Very cute and funny.
I never really liked candy corn, though I did using the top bit as a pretend "my tooth has fallen out" trick. If you bite off the yellow and orange, it really looks like a little tooth, especially when you have kid sized teeth! And then, you can eat the "tooth" and really freak everyone out even more, hehe.

marzipanapple


Quality Posts:
2

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


This is the first shirt of yours that actually made me laugh aloud. Super cute(but not *too* cute).

kender42


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


So would they be going around saying "Grains graiiiiins" or "Corn cooornnnn" or "Candy caaannndy"

Changster


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


This is awesome!

bmer525


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


This makes me smile. Good design.

dekonstruct


Quality Posts:
3

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


But where are the candy shotguns? Double Tap!

cmdixon2


Quality Posts:
4

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


I must admit this one made me laugh. Great concept. I had no idea I liked zombie candy corn.

Draug


Quality Posts:
35

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn

This needs to place this needs to place THIS NEEDS TO PLACE!!!!! X3

The enemy's gate is down.
Featured this week: Lady Umbrella

BootsBoots


Quality Posts:
5

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


My kid loves this one. He even made me print it out for him. Twice (he accidentally drooled on the first one and ruined it).

Dml18


Quality Posts:
0

send message

dekonstruct wrote:But where are the candy shotguns? Double Tap!


Always remember the double tap rule! Very clever design, and I do love zombies (even in corn form), GMV.

rockefoe


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


soo cute =)

kender42


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


This shirt needs more votes! Zombie Candy Corn love needed...almost...in...fog.

powerslaveintime


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Heading for the fog! I cannot believe the impressive climb this shirt has made. It really is freakin' adorable, though! One of the few I would wear for the sheer amusement value. Very creative.

Itsandymann


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Because the only ones on earth who like to eat candy corn are zombie candy corn!

Altheahelaine


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


please knock out tiger pumpkin
please knock out tiger pumpkin

I live, I learn, and so aid my end while I believe I'm winning

leelaaa


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


i agree that this is a funny concept...however i think it looks really bad on the shirt
but at least it isn't a cat in a pumpkin

kylemittskus


Quality Posts:
66

send message

leelaaa wrote:i agree that this is a funny concept...however i think it looks really bad on the shirt
but at least it isn't a cat in a pumpkin


Because there's no depth at all making the design look flat? Because there's a big blank space on the bottom left (as we look at it) of the shirt? Because from any distance away it looks like a bunch of blotches?

"If drinking is bitter, change yourself to wine." -Rainer Maria Rilke

"Champagne is a very kind and friendly thing on a rainy night." -Isak Dinesen

"There are many ways to the recognition of truth; Burgundy is one of them." -Isak Dinesen

Draug


Quality Posts:
35

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


IN THE FOG!!!! YESH!!!!!! X3

The enemy's gate is down.
Featured this week: Lady Umbrella

AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

kylemittskus wrote:Because there's no depth at all making the design look flat? Because there's a big blank space on the bottom left (as we look at it) of the shirt? Because from any distance away it looks like a bunch of blotches?


Because it's basically just Candy Corn Cannibalism, printed again 2 years later with more shiny and zombies?


hmmxkrazee


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Except with much better art. I still can't believe that one printed.

This design kind of looks like the old school Frogger game with all the layers.

AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

hmmxkrazee wrote:Except with much better art. I still can't believe that one printed.

This design kind of looks like the old school Frogger game with all the layers.


I dunno. This is crisper, but crisper just looks more generic to me. The rougher nature of the first one makes it more attractive to me, because it doesn't have that soulless overpolished feel. But maybe it's just because first and third in that Halloween derby were both truly awful.

Of course, the opinion of which is better doesn't change the fact that the other one happened first, either.


dmkooo


Quality Posts:
3

send message

Kebeca1690 wrote:I like the candy corn tees


OH YES!

TobiasAmaranth


Quality Posts:
1

send message

AdderXYU wrote:I dunno. This is crisper, but crisper just looks more generic to me. The rougher nature of the first one makes it more attractive to me, because it doesn't have that soulless overpolished feel. But maybe it's just because first and third in that Halloween derby were both truly awful.

Of course, the opinion of which is better doesn't change the fact that the other one happened first, either.


I know what you mean, but overall, you know you're stretching it. I mean, the other one doesn't even have zombies, which is the real point here. The only ACTUAL similarity is the fact that it's a shirt with candy corn, which would be to say that all candy corn shirts should be rejected.

I've been chatting with Fable recently. She's been pretty stressed overall, and basically, she does plan on making more serious shirts that aren't all shine when she starts feeling better. She doesn't set out to mimic the 'twins' as you phrase it. And there are a few things art-wise I fuss at her about. XD But I'm happy with her submission here. She did some fairly original expressions on the creatures compared to some of her more rushed designs, and I like the colors here.

Now, I think Woot's REAL problem is this: The derby -usually- tends to favor those who submit first. This one has been a bit of an exception thanks to all of the drama going around. But the real fix should be to announce the next derby around a week in advance, and give the artists TIME to come up with something worthwhile and submit it. Beyond that, they should accept entries early to all launch simultaneously. Some artists are busy during derby launch.

I dunno. I'm not happy with Woot either right now. Their main-page items are generally all scaffolding, and their shirt derbies do nothing but cause drama. :| I feel like -something- should change.

Arf, baby!

AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

TobiasAmaranth wrote:I know what you mean, but overall, you know you're stretching it. I mean, the other one doesn't even have zombies, which is the real point here. The only ACTUAL similarity is the fact that it's a shirt with candy corn, which would be to say that all candy corn shirts should be rejected.


Candy corn attacking and eating other candy corn is a pretty common theme. I can see how you can defend this as so widely different. And Zombies are totally unpopular, so I can see how that decision wouldn't be considered a pander, too. It's certainly original to have candy corn zombies. But I dunno, something just didn't sit right, so I had to bring it up.

I've been chatting with Fable recently. She's been pretty stressed overall, and basically, she does plan on making more serious shirts that aren't all shine when she starts feeling better. She doesn't set out to mimic the 'twins' as you phrase it. And there are a few things art-wise I fuss at her about. XD But I'm happy with her submission here. She did some fairly original expressions on the creatures compared to some of her more rushed designs, and I like the colors here.


I talk to a number of designers regularly, and often they state they are burnt out trying to come up with a design. This is when I generally tell them not to submit anything, because it will just come out sucky and forced. This is sucky and forced and blatantly crafted to win. But thank you for telling us her intentions. I'm sure she appreciates not having to type the word "bitterbitch" herself.

Now, I think Woot's REAL problem is this: The derby -usually- tends to favor those who submit first. This one has been a bit of an exception thanks to all of the drama going around. But the real fix should be to announce the next derby around a week in advance, and give the artists TIME to come up with something worthwhile and submit it. Beyond that, they should accept entries early to all launch simultaneously. Some artists are busy during derby launch.


THEN THEY SHOULD EITHER NOT COMPETE OR BRING THEIR A-GAME LATER.

This is how woot's derby works. You can blame anything you want, but IT IS FABLE'S FAULT if she cannot keep up. There are always a number of well done, finished pieces AT NOON every week, let alone by Saturday Midnight. This is how the derby works. If you can't hang with the big boys, buy more kleenex and cry about it.

The solution is not to "level the playing field" by pandering (and this entry is obviously pandering). It is to learn to work faster. It is to take your time to do the best you can, and be proud of it no matter whether it wins or not. There are plenty of people who can do FAR BETTER work within that first 36 hours between derby announcement and saturday midnight. There are plenty who will work on more complicated pieces as late as Monday because putting time into it is more important than the rush to submit. And we all know that late subs OFTEN print. This is a childish, whiny excuse that blames anyone but the "artist" as to why they are putting out lesser work. Why doesn't everyone submit simple, shiny scaffolding then? ITS SO HARD TO TAKE TIME!!!!

I dunno. I'm not happy with Woot either right now. Their main-page items are generally all scaffolding, and their shirt derbies do nothing but cause drama. :| I feel like -something- should change.


And while people like Fable pay lip service to this while entering shiny candycorn, other people are trying to change this in whatever way they can. Fable is part of the problem if she's going to use the flaws in the derby to profit instead of fight to be the change she and you claim to want to see. Using the flaws to your own benefit is just begging not to be respected, and silently stating that all you use this for is to make a grand.


Copo


Quality Posts:
0

send message

hmmxkrazee wrote:Except with much better art. I still can't believe that one printed.


That shirt was made by someone who made a total of about four entries ever (he quit after winning that one) and has never taken an art class in his life. He also did it entirely with a mouse in illustrator, which he learned how to use just weeks prior. And even at that, it's not bad at all.

So perhaps your complaints about it are justified artistically. But the idea was original, which means loads more than "This person knows how to make an image look sharp."

peakprfrmr


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


This will go well with my Cannibal Candy Corn from last year.

ShotDownSun


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


I would totally wear this.

shell6a


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Awesome!!

JustJiggles


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


It's just the WORST when people make designs for the win. Who in their right mind would want $1000?

darcypo


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Altheahelaine wrote:please knock out tiger pumpkin
please knock out tiger pumpkin


HEARTILY AGREE!!

oh, and

bwaaaaa ha ha ha ha!!
great shirt, so getting my vote.

sbalomas


Quality Posts:
0

send message

you forgot torches but you forgot pitchforks, lol. Great design! gmv


Re: Zombie Candycorn

shirtshark


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


The zombie candy corn who is biting the non-zombie candy corn on the butt cracks me up. Nice Job!

bassanimation


Quality Posts:
4

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


This is super awesome. We are big fablefire fans here at my house. Great entries!!!

alexanderjd


Quality Posts:
0

send message

TobiasAmaranth wrote:
Now, I think Woot's REAL problem is this: The derby -usually- tends to favor those who submit first. This one has been a bit of an exception thanks to all of the drama going around. But the real fix should be to announce the next derby around a week in advance, and give the artists TIME to come up with something worthwhile and submit it. Beyond that, they should accept entries early to all launch simultaneously. Some artists are busy during derby launch.


Agree completely. If not a week, at least a few days, preferrably over a weekend. As is, anyone who works a 9-5 is pretty screwed on the "early entry" category.

The only downside is: Giving that much time will present duplicate-entry problems. On the day when submissions are allowed, you'll have 100 people all sending them in at the same time, and it will be hard for Woot to distinguish which "cannible candy corn" deserves to stand when 5 such entries are submitted.

bassanimation


Quality Posts:
4

send message

TobiasAmaranth wrote:
Now, I think Woot's REAL problem is this: The derby -usually- tends to favor those who submit first.


My boyfriend thinks that a vote should = payment up front, and that may fix some of the current voting issues on Woot... The people who throw votes without thinking would not have that option, and you would also not be able to use dummy accounts (unless you're made of cash). Granted, it would be an unpopular rule at first, but if you think about why we're voting it makes perfect sense. You vote because you want to buy the shirt...(or, supposedly).

This isnt DeviantArt..we're not here to vote for cool or pretty. We're here to vote for "I want to wear that." I tend to agree that if you put a vote on something, putting your money where your mouth is would end a looot of issues here.

psychopossumarmy


Quality Posts:
0

send message

I want this shirt so bad.

PilotScotty22


Quality Posts:
0

send message

bassanimation wrote:My boyfriend thinks that a vote should = payment up front, and that may fix some of the current voting issues on Woot... The people who throw votes without thinking would not have that option, and you would also not be able to use dummy accounts (unless you're made of cash). Granted, it would be an unpopular rule at first, but if you think about why we're voting it makes perfect sense. You vote because you want to buy the shirt...(or, supposedly).

This isnt DeviantArt..we're not here to vote for cool or pretty. We're here to vote for "I want to wear that." I tend to agree that if you put a vote on something, putting your money where your mouth is would end a looot of issues here.


Couldn't agree more. As a non-artistic derby fan I only vote on the actual shirts I really would wear. Most of the time they don't end up winning and I have to see shirts like the cream colored giraffe shirt from the parks derby sit there for sale all day and not even sell out one shirt size! (At least it had not last I checked at 10pm that night. As a person that wants to buy a lot of the shirts I see on derbies that is really frustrating. Not to knock some of the designs that do win, because they are great pieces of art, but I honestly don't want to walk around with a cat in a pumpkin or a cream colored giraffe on my chest all day. If voters had to actually buy the shirts they voted on, it would make a huge difference in allowing shirts that will sell and make money to actually win. They are trying to run a business after all.

AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

PilotScotty22 wrote:Couldn't agree more. As a non-artistic derby fan I only vote on the actual shirts I really would wear. Most of the time they don't end up winning and I have to see shirts like the cream colored giraffe shirt from the parks derby sit there for sale all day and not even sell out one shirt size! (At least it had not last I checked at 10pm that night. As a person that wants to buy a lot of the shirts I see on derbies that is really frustrating. Not to knock some of the designs that do win, because they are great pieces of art, but I honestly don't want to walk around with a cat in a pumpkin or a cream colored giraffe on my chest all day. If voters had to actually buy the shirts they voted on, it would make a huge difference in allowing shirts that will sell and make money to actually win. They are trying to run a business after all.


There are a million reasons why this is a horrible idea, but since they've been repeated a million times and people still think it's a good idea, I'll just roll my eyes at how hard the idea fails and hope you guys are the first to overdraw your bank account some friday when you had to have an emergency car repair, medical visit, or simply been a bit more negligent on your spending than you thought.


PilotScotty22


Quality Posts:
0

send message

AdderXYU wrote:There are a million reasons why this is a horrible idea, but since they've been repeated a million times and people still think it's a good idea, I'll just roll my eyes at how hard the idea fails and hope you guys are the first to overdraw your bank account some friday when you had to have an emergency car repair, medical visit, or simply been a bit more negligent on your spending than you thought.


What does the having some more accountability in the voting process have to do with overdrawing a bank account? I see no parallel in your objection to suggestions in changing the voting process and your childish attempts to insult those that suggest change. If you're happy with the way it is, good for you! Please buy 3 tiger in pumpkin shirts when it gets printed and show that you are a supporter of the current process. I'll keep my money in my, in what you must assume, dilapidated bank account (which is not), and vote with my wallet.

truffleshuffle


Quality Posts:
0

send message

jasneko wrote:HA. Very cute and funny.
I never really liked candy corn, though I did using the top bit as a pretend "my tooth has fallen out" trick. If you bite off the yellow and orange, it really looks like a little tooth, especially when you have kid sized teeth! And then, you can eat the "tooth" and really freak everyone out even more, hehe.


Oh man, I totally did this too! wahahahaha. I had a great plan to use candy corn to fool the tooth fairy and make some extra money, but then I told the plan to my mom in confidentiality. For some reason the tooth fairy ended up not taking my bait *sigh*.

AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

PilotScotty22 wrote:What does the having some more accountability in the voting process have to do with overdrawing a bank account? I see no parallel in your objection to suggestions in changing the voting process and your childish attempts to insult those that suggest change. If you're happy with the way it is, good for you! Please buy 3 tiger in pumpkin shirts when it gets printed and show that you are a supporter of the current process. I'll keep my money in my, in what you must assume, dilapidated bank account (which is not), and vote with my wallet.


Voting with your wallet has everything to do with overdrawing a bank account. Because if you vote with your wallet and it puts a hold on $10 for every design you might want, and then need that money, you're screwed. If a vote means a charge as soon as it wins, and you've somehow brought your bank account down under $10 (or under $30 and all three winners were your votes), you're screwed. If you have 10 shirts you would ABSOLUTELY buy if they print, and they put a hold on your account for $10 for each vote, you have $100 on hold, which is WAY more than anyone is going to spend on a derby. And it can screw you over financially. So either you don't vote for a shirt you WOULD buy, to save yourself from the holds, or you have to be sure you have enough money to match up to your voting habits EVERY WEEK.

Not to mention any number of other situations. Let's say you're on vacation from Saturday to Thursday and don't have access to the internet (and if you do, c'mon, how many of us are gonna be reading woot, right?) You get home and you're excited that the shirt you want won. But then you check the thread to congratulate the artist, and see that it was called as plagiarized back on Sunday, and woot didn't find it rejectable. You don't want to support that sort of behaviour, whether woot OK's it or not. But now you're locked into that vote.

Or more realistically, you vote for X entry for your girlfriend/mother/sister. You plan to buy it as a gift. Hours before the winning shirt goes on sale, this person is talking to you and comments, offhand, "man, the woot shirts sure do suck this week... who picked these four? They're all one worse than the next!" welcome to ten lost dollars!

and let's not forget, some people don't have credit cards, which means any online orders might be done purely through someone else's funds, while they pay them back. Or perhaps they check the derby late and can't get money transferred to paypal in time to vote for what they want to buy. Or perhaps their birthday is coming up, and want to offer it to a family member as a great gift idea.

Point is, there are many, many reasons why locking in a vote would only DETRIMENT the very good, deserving pieces. People would vote less even for shirts they would buy if a vote forced a buy. The rabid fans are the pumpkin-cat buyers. The fact is, that WILL sell to the morons who have no sense of quality control. People WILL still lock in those sales. And seriously, for a well-off enough spite-voter, what's an extra $10 a week? They can easily sell it off at teetrade later.

The only way to level the quality field and boost great work is to make votes a factor, not the only factor. To make quality part of every print decision. People will resent having to pay per vote, and woot will just be swamped with people wishing to cancel orders, or complaining about financial issues stemming from this sort of thing. It is a foolish idea... a bandage over a gaping wound in place of stitches. It's a suggestion made by people who don't understand the underlying flaws. Believe me, horrible scaffolding will just get printed more often if we have a pay-to-vote scheme.


AlexIAm


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


On a more relevant note... is this on black or navy?

>insert funny quote here<

ZiM1021


Quality Posts:
0

send message

I reeeeeeeeeally hope the zombie candy corn wins one of the three spots. This shirt kicks all kinds of booty, it's not even funny.

TobiasAmaranth


Quality Posts:
1

send message

AdderXYU wrote:Voting with your wallet has everything to do with overdrawing a bank account. Because if you vote with your wallet and it puts a hold on $10 for every design you might want, and then need that money, you're screwed. If a vote means a charge as soon as it wins, and you've somehow brought your bank account down under $10 (or under $30 and all three winners were your votes), you're screwed. If you have 10 shirts you would ABSOLUTELY buy if they print, and they put a hold on your account for $10 for each vote, you have $100 on hold, which is WAY more than anyone is going to spend on a derby. And it can screw you over financially. So either you don't vote for a shirt you WOULD buy, to save yourself from the holds, or you have to be sure you have enough money to match up to your voting habits EVERY WEEK.

Not to mention any number of other situations. Let's say you're on vacation from Saturday to Thursday and don't have access to the internet (and if you do, c'mon, how many of us are gonna be reading woot, right?) You get home and you're excited that the shirt you want won. But then you check the thread to congratulate the artist, and see that it was called as plagiarized back on Sunday, and woot didn't find it rejectable. You don't want to support that sort of behaviour, whether woot OK's it or not. But now you're locked into that vote.

Or more realistically, you vote for X entry for your girlfriend/mother/sister. You plan to buy it as a gift. Hours before the winning shirt goes on sale, this person is talking to you and comments, offhand, "man, the woot shirts sure do suck this week... who picked these four? They're all one worse than the next!" welcome to ten lost dollars!

and let's not forget, some people don't have credit cards, which means any online orders might be done purely through someone else's funds, while they pay them back. Or perhaps they check the derby late and can't get money transferred to paypal in time to vote for what they want to buy. Or perhaps their birthday is coming up, and want to offer it to a family member as a great gift idea.

Point is, there are many, many reasons why locking in a vote would only DETRIMENT the very good, deserving pieces. People would vote less even for shirts they would buy if a vote forced a buy. The rabid fans are the pumpkin-cat buyers. The fact is, that WILL sell to the morons who have no sense of quality control. People WILL still lock in those sales. And seriously, for a well-off enough spite-voter, what's an extra $10 a week? They can easily sell it off at teetrade later.

The only way to level the quality field and boost great work is to make votes a factor, not the only factor. To make quality part of every print decision. People will resent having to pay per vote, and woot will just be swamped with people wishing to cancel orders, or complaining about financial issues stemming from this sort of thing. It is a foolish idea... a bandage over a gaping wound in place of stitches. It's a suggestion made by people who don't understand the underlying flaws. Believe me, horrible scaffolding will just get printed more often if we have a pay-to-vote scheme.


I.... WHAT? LOL. Okay uhh, right. At most, a system they create would only hold $30 maximum at any time. I mean, dude, only 3 shirts can win. And if you can't afford a $30 on your bank account, then watching the films are you doing trying to shop for anything? Plus, as long as the derby isn't over, they can definitely un-vote.

Just because it's different doesn't mean it's not a bad idea. :\ There's problems with ANY system.

And I dunno why I'm even replying. XD Your perspective is very negative. Relax some, man. I know you enjoy arguing, but really, just relax. :3

Arf, baby!

jmmbell1987


Quality Posts:
16

send message

PilotScotty22 wrote:Couldn't agree more. As a non-artistic derby fan I only vote on the actual shirts I really would wear. Most of the time they don't end up winning and I have to see shirts like the cream colored giraffe shirt from the parks derby sit there for sale all day and not even sell out one shirt size! (At least it had not last I checked at 10pm that night. As a person that wants to buy a lot of the shirts I see on derbies that is really frustrating. Not to knock some of the designs that do win, because they are great pieces of art, but I honestly don't want to walk around with a cat in a pumpkin or a cream colored giraffe on my chest all day. If voters had to actually buy the shirts they voted on, it would make a huge difference in allowing shirts that will sell and make money to actually win. They are trying to run a business after all.


I think we've been spoiled by the 3,000 shirt sellout. Woot used to sellout at 1,000, I believe. We've grown to view derby shirts that fail to crack 2,000 in sales as failures, it seems, and that's unfortunate.

And I don't mind Jewelwing's "Help From Above" winning because it was a damn good and wearable design, even if it wasn't something I'd wear personally.

AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

TobiasAmaranth wrote:I.... WHAT? LOL. Okay uhh, right. At most, a system they create would only hold $30 maximum at any time. I mean, dude, only 3 shirts can win. And if you can't afford a $30 on your bank account, then watching the films are you doing trying to shop for anything? Plus, as long as the derby isn't over, they can definitely un-vote.

Just because it's different doesn't mean it's not a bad idea. :\ There's problems with ANY system.

And I dunno why I'm even replying. XD Your perspective is very negative. Relax some, man. I know you enjoy arguing, but really, just relax. :3


I'm very relaxed. And you're very wrong.

It's a horrible idea and will cause more problems than it solves, and all in favor of the dreck that wins already.


jasonlesko


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Can I Buy One Now?

twalter87


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Got my vote! Who doesn't like a good candy corn shirt...


____________________________________________

Earlysong


Quality Posts:
10

send message

AdderXYU wrote:I'm very relaxed. And you're very wrong.

It's a horrible idea and will cause more problems than it solves, and all in favor of the dreck that wins already.


are there any shirts in this derby you do like?

I love this website! ^^

sittle


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Earlysong wrote:Adder: are there any shirts in this derby you do like?


... He's all but made sweet passionate love to every Drakxxx design... as per usual...

SunsetSam


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


First of all congrats to the artist for creating something that many seem to think is the be all end all of the halloween art world, but honestly, I am just not understanding the awesomeness of this design. Granted I am well outside the general voting age here, but c'mon kiddos, don't you have any desire to wear something unique? Sadly, there are several outside the box designs in this derby that just won't make it to print.

genericsmith


Quality Posts:
2

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


I like the idea of this shirt and find it humorous... I don't like the random gap on the lower left.

Find a new negative adjective besides "generic" people... Jeebus.
Edgar Allen Poe shall remained headlock'd until Nevermore is reckoned.

mjl9320


Quality Posts:
0

send message

genericsmith wrote:I like the idea of this shirt and find it humorous... I don't like the random gap on the lower left.


I agree. It seems almost like the submitter deleted some candy corns from the lower left in order to fit the shirt comp into the image. The shirt comp should be the main image, not an inconvenience to hide away in the corner.

AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

Earlysong wrote:are there any shirts in this derby you do like?


There are a couple with potential (I've even voiced this in their threads, but it's very convenient to ignore the many positive comments I do make throughout a week, because they're not on your favorite work boohoo), and a couple that I find somewhat attractive, but the only thing I'd consider buying (note "consider") is Dekon's ghost. I enjoy the way the mood is set so simply.

But strictly speaking, why do I want to buy a halloween shirt? I want to buy a shirt I can wear at other times, too.

Not that I'm entirely sure how a question of what i prefer this week has anything to do with how the "locked buy" idea is a horrible one. It's that sort of logical leap which makes the support for horrible ideas and horrible shirts feel so much more banal.


AdderXYU


Quality Posts:
24

send message

sittle wrote:... He's all but made sweet passionate love to every Drakxxx design... as per usual...


I don't even know how you came to this conclusion, but it is an idiotic one. Outside of the anger that his work was rejected while Seki's resub still has not met the fate of her first attempt (which anyone should feel for any designer who regularly puts effort into their work), I'm pretty sure I haven't been overly praising of his output. I'm also pretty confident that I called two of his five entries lackluster in my eyes, while I have said nearly nothing about two of the others.

Not that I expected more than an idiotic comment.


meh3884


Quality Posts:
7

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


the little guy down at the bottom looks a little out of place, but will definitely have myself one of these for the holiday

jasneko


Quality Posts:
11

send message

truffleshuffle wrote:Oh man, I totally did this too! wahahahaha. I had a great plan to use candy corn to fool the tooth fairy and make some extra money, but then I told the plan to my mom in confidentiality. For some reason the tooth fairy ended up not taking my bait *sigh*.

Ha - no way! I guess some other kid was bound to see the resemblance too;) And I thought about doing the same thing too with the tooth fairy, but then I felt guilty and just stayed with the the my-tooth-fell-out trick, hehe.

Earlysong


Quality Posts:
10

send message

AdderXYU wrote:

Not that I'm entirely sure how a question of what i prefer this week has anything to do with how the "locked buy" idea is a horrible one. It's that sort of logical leap which makes the support for horrible ideas and horrible shirts feel so much more banal.


Oh I was just curious as to whether or not there are any that you like. The locked buy thing had nothing to do with it.

I love this website! ^^

snarkygal


Quality Posts:
1

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Another Halloween, another dumb candy corn design. It was bound to happen.

Joe4pal


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Here's to hoping this one wins

kakopa


Quality Posts:
0

send message

It looks more like Kandy Korn Klansmen to me. Just make the crosses burn and there you go!

I like candy corn and all but I wouldn't wear this shirt.

Jestik


Quality Posts:
10

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


right now I'm wearing Zombie Garden and eating a bag of candy corn.

true story.


Duddles86


Quality Posts:
0

send message

mjl9320 wrote:I agree. It seems almost like the submitter deleted some candy corns from the lower left in order to fit the shirt comp into the image. The shirt comp should be the main image, not an inconvenience to hide away in the corner.


I tend to wonder if the designer tried to hide it to take your mind away from it. When I first saw the image I laughed and thought it was a funny idea. When I looked at the shirt comp I thought "oh no that doesn't look good when you see it from a distance." I'm amazed that it has such support because I've shown it to a few guy friends and they laughed but said they'd never wear it. I'll still be happy if this wins rather than the "tiger" in the pumpkin.

hollymarie1222


Quality Posts:
0

send message

This shirt is so awesome, my husband and I both want one...and we are not in the habit of dressing alike :-P

Re: Zombie Candycorn

mwitych


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


I know sooo many zombie movie fans for whom this would be an awesome present. It would be cool if I could get one.

Micro1331


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


It would be PERFECT if you made it glow in the dark somehow, I think the candy corn would look amazing if they glowed! =) AMAZING shirt, props.

naktipi


Quality Posts:
3

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Hmm...Don't know how I feel about this on the black...

Mmm. Pie.

kylemittskus


Quality Posts:
66

send message

snarkygal wrote:Another Halloween, another dumb candy corn design. It was bound to happen.


And it had to be this designer. Ok, it didn't have to be, but we all damn well expected it, right?

"If drinking is bitter, change yourself to wine." -Rainer Maria Rilke

"Champagne is a very kind and friendly thing on a rainy night." -Isak Dinesen

"There are many ways to the recognition of truth; Burgundy is one of them." -Isak Dinesen

Weredawg


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Micro1331 wrote:It would be PERFECT if you made it glow in the dark somehow, I think the candy corn would look amazing if they glowed! =) AMAZING shirt, props.


I completely agree. This shirt sorta came out of nowhere. I love it, GMV

redspecial


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


This rox.

fablefire


Quality Posts:
8

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Thanks for the support everyone! =)

SDNick484


Quality Posts:
0

send message

Re: Zombie Candycorn


Candy corn, zombies, and an angry mob -- can't get much better than this.

cravenwaves


Quality Posts:
0

send message

I love it. I must have one. How can I order it now?

Re: Zombie Candycorn

JoeDeth


Quality Posts:
2

send message

cravenwaves wrote:I love it. I must have one. How can I order it now?


Click on this link now!

MORE DERBY ENTRIES

THUMBNAIL