Re: Conflicting Theories

love the style! it reminds me of vintage disney, mary blair and the like, which i am a huge fan. nice job! and funny idea! definitely got my vote!

Love the concept but the rules say "no text" so that N on Newton has to go..you don't need it anyway!

suzer22 wrote:Love the concept but the rules say "no text" so that N on Newton has to go..you don't need it anyway!

I'm not really sure the 'N' counts as text in this case...

staffell wrote:I'm not really sure the 'N' counts as text in this case...

Yes, it does.

ThunderThighs wrote:Yes, it does.

Fair enough...I didn't realise it was so strict!

ThunderThighs wrote:Yes, it does.

I don't mind if it's rejected on those grounds, but just for the record:

Text:
12.
Linguistics . a unit of connected speech or writing, esp. composed of more than one sentence, that forms a cohesive whole.

That being, I'm not sure this does count as text.

staffell wrote:I don't mind if it's rejected on those grounds, but just for the record:

Text:
12.
Linguistics . a unit of connected speech or writing, esp. composed of more than one sentence, that forms a cohesive whole.

That being, I'm not sure this does count as text.

Yes, it does. Woot rules on text seem to always have been interpreted as anything that can be found on a keyboard--in any alphabet (letter, number, symbol)--is text.
Also, you may have seen the definition right above the one you selected?
11. Printing.
a. black letter.
b. type, as distinguished from illustrations, margins, etc.

goldenthorn wrote:Yes, it does. Woot rules on text seem to always have been interpreted as anything that can be found on a keyboard--in any alphabet (letter, number, symbol)--is text.
Also, you may have seen the definition right above the one you selected?
11. Printing.
a. black letter.
b. type, as distinguished from illustrations, margins, etc.

Ha, well I didn't realise that, and I'm not so stupid to think you couldn't google that source, but I genuinely didn't see that entry, so I apologise.

staffell wrote:Ha, well I didn't realise that, and I'm not so stupid to think you couldn't google that source, but I genuinely didn't see that entry, so I apologise.

Resub and link?